RFR:8153978:New test to verify the modules info as returned by the JVMTI
serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
Sun Jun 19 07:09:44 UTC 2016
Hi Christian,
Thank you for the reply!
Serguei
On 6/18/16 17:33, Christian Tornqvist wrote:
>
> Hi Serguei,
>
> We’re currently using jtreg 4.2 b02, so you should be able to do this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Christian
>
> *From:*serviceability-dev
> [mailto:serviceability-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net] *On Behalf Of
> *serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
> *Sent:* Friday, June 17, 2016 7:39 PM
> *To:* Alexander Kulyakhtin <alexander.kulyakhtin at oracle.com>
> *Cc:* serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net
> *Subject:* Re: RFR:8153978:New test to verify the modules info as
> returned by the JVMTI
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> I'm curious if the jtreg 4.2 is out and this test can be pushed now?
> I'd want to use the same pattern to write the Jigsaw related JVMTI tests.
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>
> On 5/5/16 04:25, Alexander Kulyakhtin wrote:
>
> Sergey,
>
> Thank you very much for the review.
> I will be pushing the fix as soon as jtreg 4.2 is out, since 4.2
> has the fix for CODETOOLS-7901662, required for this test.
>
> Best regards,
> Alexander
>
> From: serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com <mailto:serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com>
> To: alexander.kulyakhtin at oracle.com
> <mailto:alexander.kulyakhtin at oracle.com>
> Cc: serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net
> <mailto:serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net>,
> aleksey.voytilov at oracle.com <mailto:aleksey.voytilov at oracle.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 11:31:07 PM GMT +03:00 Iraq
> Subject: Re: RFR:8153978:New test to verify the modules info as
> returned by the JVMTI
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> It looks good.
> Thank you for making the changes!
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>
>
> On 5/4/16 05:17, Alexander Kulyakhtin wrote:
>
> Hi Sergey,
>
> Thank you very much for the review.
>
> Please, find the updated webrev with your findings corrected at:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akulyakh/8153978_02/index.html
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eakulyakh/8153978_02/index.html>
>
> Best regards,
> Alexander
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
> <mailto:serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com>
> To: alexander.kulyakhtin at oracle.com
> <mailto:alexander.kulyakhtin at oracle.com>,
> serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net
> <mailto:serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Cc: aleksey.voytilov at oracle.com
> <mailto:aleksey.voytilov at oracle.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 1:06:05 AM GMT +03:00 Iraq
> Subject: Re: RFR:8153978:New test to verify the modules info
> as returned by the JVMTI
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
>
> Could you, fix a couple of minor issues?
>
> test/serviceability/jvmti/GetModulesInfo/JvmtiGetAllModulesTest.java
>
> 58 for(Module mod : my.modules()) {
>
> 59 if(!jvmtiModules.contains(mod)) {
>
> A space is missed after the 'for' and 'if' keywords.
>
>
> test/serviceability/jvmti/GetModulesInfo/ModulesInfo.java.
>
> 31 boolean compareExcludingUnnamed(ModulesInfo other) {
>
> I'd suggest to call it compareNamed.
>
>
> Otherwise, the new test looks great.
> Thanks a lot for taking care about it!
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>
>
> On 4/29/16 06:12, Alexander Kulyakhtin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Could you, please, review these test-only changes (adding a new test).
>
> CR:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153978 "New test to verify the modules info as returned by the JVMTI"
>
> Webrev:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akulyakh/8153978_01/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eakulyakh/8153978_01/>
>
> The new test verifies that JVMTI returns the correct info about the modules loaded at the application startup.
>
> It also verifies that the returned info is consistent with the same info returned by the Java API.
>
> It then loads a new named module and checks the correctness of the JVMTI info again.
>
> Due to a tools issuehttps://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/CODETOOLS-7901662 the test can only be pushed in when the updated jtreg is released.
>
> The test passes fine with the nightly jtreg build, containing the CODETOOLS-7901662 fix.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alexander
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20160619/7acf9cb3/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list