Jigsaw Enhancement RFR round #2: 8159145 Add JVMTI function GetModuleByPackageName
stanislav lukyanov
stanislav.lukyanov at oracle.com
Wed Jun 22 17:09:19 UTC 2016
Hi Serguei,
What is the expected behavior when passed string is not a valid package
name (e.g. contains illegal characters)?
I think I'd expect JVMTI_ERROR_ILLEGAL_ARGUMENT to be returned in that case.
Now it looks like the method will return unnamed module not only for an
empty string
but for any string that is not a known package name.
If it's correct, I think the empty string case shouldn't be described
explicitly.
Thanks,
Stas
On 22.06.2016 16:05, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
> I've updated the libGetModuleByPkgTest.c in place in the webrev #2
> with minor improvements.
> Sorry, if it spoiled your work.
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>
> On 6/22/16 04:07, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
>> Here are new hotspot webrev where I've fixed the comments from Alan
>> and Christian.
>>
>> Hotspot:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2016/hotspot/8159145-jigsaw-jvmti-pkg.2
>>
>>
>>
>> The Jdk webrev is the same:
>> http://javaweb.sfbay.sun.com/java/svc/ss45998/webrevs/2016/hotspot/8159145-jigsaw-jvmti-pkg.jdk1/
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Serguei
>>
>>
>> On 6/21/16 02:54, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Please, review the Jigsaw fix for the enhancement:
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8159145
>>>
>>>
>>> The Hotspot webrev:
>>> http://javaweb.sfbay.sun.com/java/svc/ss45998/webrevs/2016/hotspot/8159145-jigsaw-jvmti-pkg.1/
>>>
>>>
>>> The Jdk webrev:
>>> http://javaweb.sfbay.sun.com/java/svc/ss45998/webrevs/2016/hotspot/8159145-jigsaw-jvmti-pkg.jdk1/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Summary:
>>>
>>> JVM TI agents that instrument code in named modules need the Module
>>> at class load time.
>>>
>>> One way to do this is by introducing a new ClassFileLoadHook that
>>> takes an additional parameter but this approach is disruptive.
>>> The alternative option is a JVM TI function that maps a
>>> classloader + package name to a module.
>>> We were initially not confident with this approach so we
>>> introduced it as JVM function JVM_GetModuleByPackageName.
>>> Based on experience to date then this approach seems okay and so
>>> this function needs to be promoted to a JVMTI function.
>>>
>>> This fix is to introduce new JVMTI function GetModuleByPackageName.
>>> It includes new jtreg test with native JVMTI agent.
>>>
>>> A CCC is fast-tracked and getting an approval is in progress.
>>>
>>> Testing:
>>> Run newly developed jtreg test.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Serguei
>>
>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list