RFR (S): 8137165: Tests fail in SR_Handler because thread is not VMThread or JavaThread

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Tue Mar 15 07:07:06 UTC 2016


Thanks Kim - pushing now.

In a way this does "fix" the original problem as we should no longer get 
to that particular assert :)

Robbin: you don't have an OpenJDK user name yet! So I couldn't give you 
reviewing credit. :(

David
-----

On 15/03/2016 4:48 PM, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> On Mar 15, 2016, at 2:43 AM, David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kim,
>>
>> On 15/03/2016 4:34 PM, Kim Barrett wrote:
>>>> On Mar 14, 2016, at 2:46 AM, David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8137165
>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8137165/webrev/
>>>>
>>>> This isn't a fix per-se but some additional diagnostic code to try and detect the conditions where the bug might manifest. The basic failure mode was:
>>>
>>> Changes look good.
>>>
>>> Good cleanup with the sigemptyset calls.  Pedantic is a good thing when dealing with POSIX.
>>
>> Thanks for the Review.
>>
>>> Since this isn’t an actual fix, should the change be associated with a different bug number?
>>> Or are you treating this as the moral equivalent of resolving as not reproducible?
>>
>> I toyed with creating a subtask for this change and leaving the original open, but realistically I think it may turn out to be "not reproducible". I can be swayed if you think a new subtask would be better?
>
> Just making sure I understood your intent.  It doesn’t look like there’s so much information in this one that creating a new one with a reference would be a big problem if it ever shows up again.  Go ahead as is.
>
>


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list