RFR[9u-dev]: 8150900: Implement diagnostic_pd

[Cheleswer Sahu]

Hi,

 

I just wanted to let you know that since review there has been one new file added  “commandLineFlagWriteableList.cpp”,  and this files also needs to be modified/updated for implementing “diagnostic_pd”. This is just one additional change over what was reviewed before,  so I am  going ahead with this fix and need not a new review. I have tested this change and its working fine as before.

 

Webrev link: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~csahu/8150900/webrev.01/

 

Regards, 

Cheleswer

 

From: Cheleswer Sahu 
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 2:29 PM
To: Christian Thalinger
Cc: Kevin Walls; Gerard Ziemski; serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net; hotspot-runtime-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: RFR[9u-dev]: 8150900: Implement diagnostic_pd

 

Thanks Christian for review. I will correct the alignment.

 

Regards,

Cheleswer

 

From: Christian Thalinger 
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 1:00 AM
To: Cheleswer Sahu
Cc: Kevin Walls; Gerard Ziemski; HYPERLINK "mailto:serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net"serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net; HYPERLINK "mailto:hotspot-runtime-dev at openjdk.java.net"hotspot-runtime-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR[9u-dev]: 8150900: Implement diagnostic_pd

 


src/share/vm/runtime/globals.hpp

-  develop_pd(bool, ImplicitNullChecks,                                      \
+  diagnostic_pd(bool, ImplicitNullChecks,                                      \
           "Generate code for implicit null checks")                         \

Align the \

 

On May 10, 2016, at 1:47 AM, Cheleswer Sahu <HYPERLINK "mailto:cheleswer.sahu at oracle.com"cheleswer.sahu at oracle.com> wrote:

 

Hi, 
I need one reviewer (R) to review these changes before pushing in JDK9.  Can somebody please review the changes.

Regards,
Cheleswer



-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Walls
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 3:53 PM
To: Cheleswer Sahu; Gerard Ziemski
Cc: HYPERLINK "mailto:serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net"serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net; hotspot-runtime-
HYPERLINK "mailto:dev at openjdk.java.net"dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR[9u-dev]: 8150900: Implement diagnostic_pd


Thanks Cheleswer, looks good to me too, have been over the macros as
much as I can!

Thanks
Kevin



On 03/05/2016 07:34, Cheleswer Sahu wrote:

Hi Gerard,




-----Original Message-----
From: Gerard Ziemski
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 9:07 PM
To: Cheleswer Sahu
Cc: HYPERLINK "mailto:hotspot-runtime-dev at openjdk.java.net"hotspot-runtime-dev at openjdk.java.net; serviceability-
HYPERLINK "mailto:dev at openjdk.java.net"dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR[9u-dev]: 8150900: Implement diagnostic_pd

hi Cheleswer,


#1 Shouldn’t the following files be modified as well? :

open:

src/cpu/sparc/vm/globals_sparc.hpp
src/cpu/x86/vm/globals_x86.hpp
src/cpu/zero/vm/globals_zero.hpp

closed:

cpu/arm/vm/globals_arm.hpp

I have implemented  "diagnostic_pd" using "product_pd" as a reference

implementation. "product_pd" is not implemented for " ARCH_FLAGS ",
therefore I have also not implemented "diagnostic_pd" for "ARCH_FLAGS"
type.

 

share/vm/runtime/globals_ext.hpp
share/vm/runtime/os_ext.hpp

These 2 files are under closed repository, so I have initiated a separate

internal review request for those changes.

 


#2 Bunch of header files need to be updated with 2016 for Copyright:

/*
- * Copyright (c) 2011, 2015, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 2011, 2016, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
 * ORACLE PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL.  Use is subject to license terms.
 */

I agree, I will update the copyright headers.



#3 What tests have you run? Did you do:

a) JPRT hotspot
b) RBT hs-nightly-runtime

I have run JPRT hostspot tests for this. It shows no error.



Please email me if you need help with those.


#4 Just heads up that I will be shortly asking for review of my fix
(https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073500), which touches
many of the same file, so one of us will have a tricky merge

Thanks for informing about this.


Regards,
Cheleswer



cheers



On May 2, 2016, at 4:51 AM, Cheleswer Sahu

<HYPERLINK "mailto:cheleswer.sahu at oracle.com"cheleswer.sahu at oracle.com> wrote:

Hi,



Please review the code changes for

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150900.



Webrev Link: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~csahu/8150900/webrev.00/



Enhancement Brief:  A new variant of flag "diagnostic_pd" is

implemented.

All flags which are diagnostic in nature and platform dependent can
be placed

under this variant. These flags can be enable using  "-

XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions".

At present I have placed 4 flags under "diagnostic_pd"

1.        1. InitArrayShortSize

2.        2. ImplicitNullChecks

3.        3. InlineFrequencyCount

4.        4. PostLoopMultiversioning





Regards,

Cheleswer

 

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20160524/f497a7b7/attachment-0001.html>