RFR: 8165827: Support private interface methods in JNI, JDWP, JDI and JDB

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Tue Oct 18 07:16:45 UTC 2016


Thanks Serguei!

David

On 18/10/2016 5:10 PM, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
> David,
>
> It looks good.
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>
> On 10/17/16 20:59, David Holmes wrote:
>> Hi Lois, Dan, Serguei,
>>
>> Went to push this today and realized I had left off the updated JNI
>> method lookup tests. As I said in the bug report JNI behaves as
>> expected, but there weren't any testcases so I added them:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8165827/webrev.hotspot/
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>>
>> On 11/10/2016 11:55 AM, David Holmes wrote:
>>> Turns out the only place changes were needed were in JDI.
>>>
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165827
>>>
>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8165827/webrev/
>>>
>>> The spec change in ObjectReference is very simple and there is a CCC
>>> request in progress to ratify that change.
>>>
>>> The implementation change in ObjectReferenceImpl mirrors the updated
>>> spec and use the same format as already present in the class version of
>>> the check method.
>>>
>>> The test is a little more complex. This is obviously an extension to
>>> what is already tested in InterfaceMethodsTest. However IMT has a number
>>> of problem with the way it is currently written [1] - specifically it
>>> doesn't properly separate method lookup from method invocation. So I've
>>> added the capability to separate lookup and invocation for use with the
>>> private interface methods - I have not tried to address shortcomings of
>>> the existing tests. Though I did fix the return value checking logic!
>>> And did some clarifying comments and renaming in a couple of place.
>>>
>>> Still on the test I can't add the negative tests I would like to add
>>> because they actually pass due to a different long standing bug in JDI -
>>> [2]. So the actual private interface method testing is very simple: can
>>> I get the Method from the InterfaceType for the interface declaring the
>>> method? Can I then invoke that method on an instance of a class that
>>> implements the interface.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> David
>>>
>>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166453
>>> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167416
>
>


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list