RFA: 8173941: SA does not work if executable is DSO
Yasumasa Suenaga
yasuenag at gmail.com
Tue Feb 14 23:38:52 UTC 2017
* I added serviceability-dev
Hi all,
JDK-8173941 has been approved to push to jdk8u repo.
I added noreg label to JBS. Could you help me to push it?
Thanks,
Yasumasa
2017/02/15 午前8:09 "Rob McKenna" <rob.mckenna at oracle.com>:
> Approved, but please add an appropriate noreg label to the bug. Also
> please work with the serviceability team to get this pushed.
>
> -Rob
>
> On 14/02/17 10:16, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > JBS:
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173941
> >
> > 9 changeset:
> > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs/hotspot/rev/b3d95edd4467
> >
> > 9 review:
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/
> 2017-February/020968.html
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/
> 2017-February/020973.html
> >
> > In modern Linux e.g. Fedora 25, executables are built as DSO for
> security [1].
> > java command in OpenJDK which is provided by distribution is also DSO.
> > However, SA does not work with DSO executables.
> >
> > Currently, OpenJDK 8 in Fedora 25 is built as DSO.
> > So I want to contribute this patch to jdk8u.
> >
> >
> > I'm not a committer of jdk8u. So I need a sponsor.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Yasumasa
> >
> >
> > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#PIE
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20170215/8695b356/attachment.html>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list