RFR: JDK-8173664: Typo in https://java.net/downloads/heap-snapshot/hprof-binary-format.html

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Thu May 11 10:54:44 UTC 2017


Looks good.

Thanks,
David

On 11/05/2017 7:33 PM, Fairoz Matte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find the updated webrev with suggested changes
> Webrev - http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8173664/webrev.01/
> BugID: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173664
>
> Thanks,
> Fairoz
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Fairoz Matte
>> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 9:05 AM
>> To: David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com>; serviceability-
>> dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: RE: RFR: JDK-8173664: Typo in https://java.net/downloads/heap-
>> snapshot/hprof-binary-format.html
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> After having discussion with you over IM things are clear Expected change is -
>> "There will be a "LOAD CLASS" tag for the type of each array in the dump"
>> and current changeset missed "the" before type.
>>
>> I will make the changes and send it again.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Fairoz
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: David Holmes
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 7:52 AM
>>> To: Fairoz Matte <fairoz.matte at oracle.com>; serviceability-
>>> dev at openjdk.java.net
>>> Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8173664: Typo in
>>> https://java.net/downloads/heap- snapshot/hprof-binary-format.html
>>>
>>> On 10/05/2017 9:30 PM, Fairoz Matte wrote:
>>>> Hi David,
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: David Holmes
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 3:26 PM
>>>>> To: Fairoz Matte <fairoz.matte at oracle.com>; serviceability-
>>>>> dev at openjdk.java.net
>>>>> Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8173664: Typo in
>>>>> https://java.net/downloads/heap- snapshot/hprof-binary-format.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Fairoz,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/05/2017 5:53 PM, Fairoz Matte wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kindly review the small typo fix, applicable only for JDK8
>>>>>> BugID: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173664
>>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8173664/webrev/
>>>>>
>>>>> I think "for type type" was intended to be "for the type".
>>>>>
>>>> Yes it does look like after reading multiple times.
>>>> Thanks for the review I will close as Not an issue
>>>
>>> ??? It is still a typo that can be fixed.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Fairoz
>>>>
>>>>> David
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Fairoz
>>>>>>


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list