CSR review request for: 8187289 NotifyFramePop request is not cleared if JVMTI_EVENT_FRAME_POP is disabled
serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
Fri Nov 17 05:40:15 UTC 2017
On 11/16/17 18:23, David Holmes wrote:
> On 17/11/2017 12:00 PM, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> I've to leave now for a couple of hours.
>> I've created the CSR from the real bug report, but don't know
>> anything about the bugs-stage.
>> A link "csr for" was auto-added when the CSR was created.
>
> You must have done that while looking at the bug on bugs-stage.
Most likely.
But it is unclear how I've got there. :(
> The real bug:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187289
Ok.
I'll create the CSR once more.
Thank you for catching this problem, David!
Thanks,
Serguei
> has no CSR.
>
> David
>
>> Thanks,
>> Serguei
>>
>>
>> On 11/16/17 17:53, David Holmes wrote:
>>> The CSR needs to be created again from the real bug report. Everyone
>>> will need to re-review and re-add any necessary comments.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> On 17/11/2017 11:51 AM, David Holmes wrote:
>>>> On 17/11/2017 10:25 AM, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
>>>>> Dan and Chris
>>>>>
>>>>> Could one of you, please, review the CSR for 8187289:
>>>>> https://bugs-stage.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8191098
>>>>>
>>>>> Bug is:
>>>>> https://bugs-stage.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187289
>>>>
>>>> The links above should not be to bugs-stage!
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>> Approved webrev:
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esspitsyn/webrevs/2017/hotspot/8187289-jvmti-framepop.2/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This CSR covers a change in behavior, not in the JVMTI spec.
>>>>> We decided that the JVMTI NotifyFramePop is intuitive enough and
>>>>> does not need an update.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Serguei
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list