RFR: 8191564: Refactor GC related servicability code into GC specific subclasses
Roman Kennke
rkennke at redhat.com
Thu Nov 30 18:26:57 UTC 2017
Hi Mandy,
thanks for reviewing! I think Erik Ö. already pushed it for me.
> A minor comment that GCMemoryManager could take an enum to indicate the
> type of this GC action (major vs minor). This can be a future cleanup.
This may be overly restrictive: some GCs may not necessarily provide a
major/minor distinction, but have only one GC manager (e.g. epsilon), or
may provide 3 or more GC managers (e.g. 'minor' partial (or young) GC,
'intermediate' concurrent GC, 'intermediate or major' concurrent full
GC, 'major' STW last-ditch full GC...).
Roman
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list