RFR: 8187403: [Unknown generation] is shown in Stack Memory on HSDB

Jini George jini.george at oracle.com
Fri Oct 6 15:28:25 UTC 2017


Your changes look good, Yasumasa.

Thanks,
Jini (Not a Reviewer).

On 9/29/2017 2:49 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
> Thanks Serguei,
> 
> I'm waiting another reviewer.
> 
> 
> Yasumasa
> 
> 
> 2017/09/29 午後6:00 "serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com 
> <mailto:serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com>" <serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com 
> <mailto:serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com>>:
> 
> 
> 
>     On 9/29/17 01:25, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
> 
>         Thanks Serguei,
> 
>         I've uploaded new webrev. Could you review again?
>         http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.02/
>         <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.02/>
> 
> 
>     Looks good.
>     I can sponsor it, but you probably need another review.
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Serguei
> 
> 
>         Yasumasa
> 
> 
> 
>         2017-09-29 16:49 GMT+09:00 serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
>         <mailto:serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com>
>         <serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com <mailto:serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com>>:
> 
>             Hi Yasumasa,
> 
> 
>             On 9/28/17 23:21, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
> 
>             Hi Serguet,
> 
>             Thank you for your comment.
> 
>             http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.01/src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/gc/g1/HeapRegion.java.frames.html
>             <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.01/src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/gc/g1/HeapRegion.java.frames.html>
> 
>                 It seems, there is no reason for renaming 'type' to 't'
>             in the
>             initialize() method.
> 
>             I added new private member "type" as HeapRegionType.
> 
>             http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.01/src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/gc/g1/HeapRegion.java.udiff.html
>             <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.01/src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/gc/g1/HeapRegion.java.udiff.html>
> 
>             So I renamed to "t" to avoid conflict.
> 
> 
>             There is no conflict.
>             Only local is used in the initialize() method.
>             Also, the initialize() method is static so that the instance
>             field 'type' is
>             not in its scope.
>             Otherwise, you could use this.type to avoid such a conflict.
> 
> 
>             http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.01/src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/gc/g1/HeapRegionManager.java.frames.html
>             <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.01/src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/gc/g1/HeapRegionManager.java.frames.html>
> 
>                 89     public HeapRegion addrToRegion(Address addr) {
>                 90       return regions().getByAddress(addr);
>                 91     }
> 
>                 A suggestion: replace 'addrToRegion' with 'getByAddress'.
>                 It will look similar to the 'heapRegionIterator.'
> 
>             I've implemented it to follow HotSpot implementation.
> 
>             http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/hs/file/3a45532a1854/src/hotspot/share/gc/g1/heapRegionManager.inline.hpp#l32
>             <http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/hs/file/3a45532a1854/src/hotspot/share/gc/g1/heapRegionManager.inline.hpp#l32>
> 
>             I think current proposal is easy to understand if other
>             people check
>             this with HotSpot.
>             Should I rename to "getByAddress" ?
> 
> 
>                 81     public Iterator<HeapRegion> heapRegionIterator() {
>                 82         return regions().heapRegionIterator(length());
>                 83     }
>                . . .
>                 89     public HeapRegion addrToRegion(Address addr) {
>                 90       return regions().getByAddress(addr);
>                 91     }
> 
> 
>                 There is already regions().getByAddress(addr), so I'm
>             suggesting to follow
>             this local pattern.
>                 Renaming 'addrToRegion' to 'getByAddress' will unify it
>             with the
>             'heapRegionIterator()'.
>                 Otherwise, you would need to rename 'getByAddress' to
>             'addrToRegion'
>             everywhere.
>                 But I guess, it is better to avoid.
> 
>             Thanks,
>             Serguei
> 
> 
> 
>             Other your comment will be fixed in new webrev later.
> 
>             Thanks,
> 
>             Yasumasa
> 
> 
>             2017-09-29 14:35 GMT+09:00 serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
>             <mailto:serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com>
>             <serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
>             <mailto:serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com>>:
> 
>             Hi Yasumasa,
> 
>             Just some minor comments.
> 
>             http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.01/src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/gc/g1/G1HeapRegionTable.java.frames.html
>             <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.01/src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/gc/g1/G1HeapRegionTable.java.frames.html>
> 
>             I'd suggest to make the lines 144-145 a one-liner.
>             It won't be that big. Otherwise, the indent is not right.
> 
>             http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.01/src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/gc/g1/HeapRegion.java.frames.html
>             <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.01/src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/gc/g1/HeapRegion.java.frames.html>
> 
>                 The same as above for lines 85-86.
>                 It seems, there is no reason for renaming 'type' to 't'
>             in the
>             initialize() method.
> 
> 
>             http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.01/src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/gc/g1/HeapRegionManager.java.frames.html
>             <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.01/src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/gc/g1/HeapRegionManager.java.frames.html>
> 
>                 89     public HeapRegion addrToRegion(Address addr) {
>                 90       return regions().getByAddress(addr);
>                 91     }
> 
>                 A suggestion: replace 'addrToRegion' with 'getByAddress'.
>                 It will look similar to the 'heapRegionIterator.'
> 
> 
>             http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.01/src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/gc/g1/HeapRegionType.java.html
>             <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.01/src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/gc/g1/HeapRegionType.java.html>
> 
>                 41     private static int freeTag;
>                 42
>                 43     private static int youngMask;
>                 44
>                 45     private static int humongousMask;
>                 46
>                 47     private static int pinnedMask;
>                 48
>                 49     private static int oldMask;
>                 50
>                 51     private static CIntegerField tagField;
> 
>                 Unneeded empty lines.
> 
>                 Also, it looks like the fields 'freeTag' and
>             'pinnedMask' are never
>             initialized.
>                 Not sure, if it is intentional.
> 
>             Otherwise, the fix looks good to me.
> 
>             Thanks,
>             Serguei
> 
> 
>             On 9/28/17 18:20, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
> 
>             Hi Serguei,
> 
>             I added it to JBS:
> 
>             https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187403?focusedCommentId=14119248&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14119248
>             <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187403?focusedCommentId=14119248&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14119248>
> 
>             Sorry for my English. I'm not good at English...
> 
> 
>             Please, don't worry about your English.
>             Your description looks good.
>             Thank you for the bug report update!
> 
>             Thanks,
>             Serguei
> 
> 
>             Yasumasa
> 
> 
> 
>             2017-09-29 8:27 GMT+09:00 serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
>             <mailto:serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com>
>             <serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
>             <mailto:serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com>>:
> 
>             Hi Yasumasa,
> 
>             Could you, please, also add some evaluation to the bug
>             report about what is
>             the root cause and how do you fix it?
> 
>             Thanks,
>             Serguei
> 
> 
> 
>             On 9/26/17 18:10, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
> 
>             Hi all,
> 
>             I added noreg-hard label to JBS because this issue appears Stack
>             Memory window on HSDB (GUI application). So it is hard to test.
> 
>             https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187403
>             <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187403>
> 
> 
>             Thanks,
> 
>             Yasumasa
> 
> 
> 
>             2017-09-26 23:55 GMT+09:00 Yasumasa Suenaga
>             <yasuenag at gmail.com <mailto:yasuenag at gmail.com>>:
> 
>             Hi all,
> 
>             I uploaded new webrev to be adapted to jdk10/hs:
> 
>             http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.01/
>             <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.01/>
> 
> 
>             Thanks,
> 
>             Yasumasa
> 
> 
>             On 2017/09/21 7:48, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
> 
>             PING:
> 
>             Have you checked this issue?
> 
>             http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.00/
>             <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.00/>
> 
> 
>             Yasumasa
> 
> 
> 
>             On 2017/09/11 11:18, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
> 
>             Hi all,
> 
>             This review request is a part of [1].
> 
> 
>             JBS:
>             https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187403
>             <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187403>
> 
>             webrev:
>             http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.00/
>             <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8187403/webrev.00/>
> 
> 
>             I cannot access JPRT. So I need a sponsor.
> 
> 
>             Thanks,
> 
>             Yasumasa
> 
> 
>             [1]
> 
>             http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2017-September/021821.html
>             <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2017-September/021821.html>
> 
> 
> 
> 


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list