RFR (XS) 8215495: Always set isCopy
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Tue Dec 18 00:25:23 UTC 2018
LGTM.
Thanks,
David
On 18/12/2018 8:53 am, JC Beyler wrote:
> Sounds good to me:
>
> For the odd corner case:
>
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8215495/webrev.01/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8215495/webrev.01>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215495
>
> Thanks!
> Jc
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 2:39 PM David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com
> <mailto:david.holmes at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Jc,
>
> On 18/12/2018 8:12 am, JC Beyler wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > I understand the rationale behind the "If the method does return
> NULL,
> > then isCopy's value is undefined". But what about
> > the DEFINE_GETSCALARARRAYELEMENTS case?
> >
> > It does this:
> > if (len == 0) { \
> > /* Empty array: legal but useless, can't return NULL. \
> > * Return a pointer to something useless. \
> > * Avoid asserts in typeArrayOop. */ \
> > result = (ElementType*)get_bad_address(); \
> >
> > Should we at least then put isCopy to JNI_FALSE in that case
> since it
> > does not return NULL and no exception is raised,
>
> Sure - it's an odd corner case, but better not to leave isCopy
> potentially uninitialized.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> > Thanks,
> > Jc
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 1:29 PM David Holmes
> <david.holmes at oracle.com <mailto:david.holmes at oracle.com>
> > <mailto:david.holmes at oracle.com
> <mailto:david.holmes at oracle.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jc,
> >
> > On 18/12/2018 3:42 am, JC Beyler wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Could I get a review for this webrev:
> > >
> > > Webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8215495/webrev.00/
> > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215495
> >
> > isCopy only has to be set if the method executes successfully
> >
> > "If isCopy is not NULL, then *isCopy is set to JNI_TRUE if a
> copy is
> > made; or it is set to JNI_FALSE if no copy is made."
> >
> > You can only make (or not) a copy if the operation actually
> > succeeds. So
> > before checking isCopy the caller must check for NULL and/or
> a pending
> > exception.
> >
> > I see no bug here.
> >
> > David
> > -----
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jc
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jc
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
> Jc
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list