RFR JDK-8198253: ThreadInfo.from(CompositeData) assigning fields incorrectly in JDK 9

mandy chung mandy.chung at oracle.com
Tue Feb 27 20:31:32 UTC 2018


I made further edits to the javadoc and I am happy with this version 
(move out the attributes for StackTraceElement as a separate table).

Specdiff:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk11/webrevs/8198253/specdiff/overview-summary.html

javadoc:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk11/webrevs/8198253/api/java/lang/management/

Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk11/webrevs/8198253/webrev.02/

Mandy

On 2/27/18 10:55 AM, mandy chung wrote:
> Good point, Jeremy.  I notice some strange-ness when I wrote it but
> wasn't able to pin point the error.  Daniel also suggests to clarify
> MonitorInfo as well.
>
> Does this version look better?
>   
>
>       * Returns a {@code ThreadInfo} object represented by the
>       * given {@code CompositeData}.
>       * <a id="attributes"></a>
>       * A {@code CompositeData} representing a {@code ThreadInfo} of
>       * version <em>N</em> must contain all of the attributes defined
>       * in version ≤ <em>N</em> unless specified otherwise.
>       * Same rule applies transitively to attributes whose type or
>       * component type is {@code CompositeType}.
>       * <p>
>       * A {@code CompositeData} representing {@code ThreadInfo} of version
>       * <em>N</em> contains {@code "stackTrace"} attribute representing
>       * an array of {@code StackTraceElement} of version <em>N</em>.
>       * The {@code "lockedMonitors"} attribute represents
>       * an array of {@link MonitorInfo} of version <em>N</em>
>       * which implies that its {@code "lockedStackFrame"} attribute also
>       * represents {@code StackTraceElement} of the same version, <em>N</em>.
>       * Otherwise, this method will throw {@code IllegalArgumentException}.
>
> Mandy

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20180227/fd145b64/attachment.html>


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list