RFR(S): 8151259: [TESTBUG] nsk/jvmti/RedefineClasses/redefclass030 fails with "unexpected values of outer fields of the class" when running with -Xcomp
Chris Plummer
chris.plummer at oracle.com
Mon Jul 23 07:42:16 UTC 2018
Hello,
Please review the following fix for JDK11:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151259
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cjplummer/8151259/webrev.00
It fixes the following 3 tests:
vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/RedefineClasses/redefclass028.java
vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/RedefineClasses/redefclass029.java
vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/RedefineClasses/redefclass030.java
Any of which could fail when run with -Xcomp with (followed by a bunch
more errors):
# ERROR: Redefinition not started. Maybe running with -Xcomp. Test
ignored.
Although lately we've only seen this with redefclass030.java on macosx.
These 3 tests do redefinition of a "hot" method after triggering
compilation for it. After the redef some testing is done to ensure that
the redef was done correctly, but the issue these test have actually
comes before any redef is done.
The test attempts to trigger compilation by calling a hot method a lot.
The agent detects compilation by receiving a CompiledMethodLoad event.
There was an issue discovered long ago that when -Xcomp is used, the
compilation happens before the "hot" method is ever called. Then the
redef would happen before compilation, and this somehow messed up the
test (I'm not exactly sure how). The fix was to basically abandon the
redef attempt when this problem is detected, and then supposedly just
let the test run to completion (skipping the actual testing of the
redef). After this change, if you ran with -Xcomp it would pass, but if
you looked in the log you would see:
# ERROR: Redefinition not started. Maybe running with -Xcomp. Test
ignored.
However, there was a bug in the logic to make the test run to
completion, and also causes the above message to not appear. Instead the
test would fail with:
# ERROR: Redefinition not completed.
Followed by a bunch more error message during the part of the test that
checks if the redef was done properly.
If the CompiledMethodLoad event comes in before the hot method is ever
called (which it does with -Xcomp), the test sets fire = -1. If the hot
method was called, it is set to 1. The setting of fire = -1 was added
to fix the -Xcomp problem mentioned above. The jvmti agent does the
following:
do {
THREAD_sleep(1);
/* wait for compilation to happen */
} while(fire == 0);
if (fire == 1) {
/* do the redef here */
NSK_DISPLAY0("agentProc: <<<<<<<< RedefineClasses() is
successfully done\n");
} else {
// fire == -1
NSK_DISPLAY0("agentProc: \"hot\" method wasn't executed. Don't
perform redefinition\n");
}
The agent then syncs with the debuggee, waiting for it finish up. What
the test expects is that waitForRedefinitionStarted() in the debuggee
will time out after two seconds while waiting for fire == 1 (which it
thinks will will always happen because it was set to -1). When it times
out, the test does appear to exit properly with, but with the following
in the log, which is intended:
# ERROR: Redefinition not started. Maybe running with -Xcomp. Test
ignored.
However, sometimes before waitForRedefinitionStarted() times out, the
hot method is called enough times to trigger compilation. So another
CompiledMethodLoad event arrives, and this time fire is set to 1.
Because of this, waitForRedefinitionStarted() doesn't time out and
returns with an indication that the redef has started. After this
waitForRedefinitionCompleted() is executed. It waits for the redef to
complete, but it never does since the agent decided not to do the redef
when it saw fire == -1. So waitForRedefinitionCompleted() times out
after 10 seconds and the test fails, with:
# ERROR: Redefinition not completed.
Actually the above error is not really what causes the failure. When the
above error is detected, no error status is set and the test continues
as if the redef had been done. So then the logic that detects if the
redef was done properly ends up failing, and that's where the test
actually indicates a failure status. You see a whole bunch of other
errors in the log because of all the checks that fail.
The fix is to not abandon the test when the first CompiledMethodLoad
event is before the hot method was called. Instead just leave fire==0
and wait for the next CompiledMethodLoad event that is triggered after
the method is called enough times to be recompiled. I'm not sure why it
was not originally done this way. Possibly the recompilation did not
happen reliably, but I have not run into this problem. The other changes
in redefclass030.c are just cleaning up debug tracing.
Another fix was to properly set the error status when
waitForRedefinitionStarted() or waitForRedefinitionCompleted() times
out, although this is just a safety net and I didn't run into any cases
where this happened after fixing the CompiledMethodLoad event handling.
So in general the changes in redefclass030.java were not needed, but
provide better error handling.
thanks,
Chris
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list