RFR(S) 8199924: Solaris: Correctly enqueue null arguments of attach operations

Daniel D. Daugherty daniel.daugherty at oracle.com
Wed Mar 21 13:58:57 UTC 2018


Hmmm... shouldn't the inconsistency in the Solaris backend also be
addressed?

Dan


On 3/21/18 8:45 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> thanks for looking at this. I currently have no emotions whether to fix it in C or in Java - I'll check it out...
>
> Best regards
> Christoph
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Holmes [mailto:david.holmes at oracle.com]
>> Sent: Mittwoch, 21. März 2018 10:20
>> To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>; serviceability-
>> dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: Re: RFR(S) 8199924: Solaris: Correctly enqueue null arguments of
>> attach operations
>>
>> Hi Christoph,
>>
>> On 21/03/2018 6:10 PM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> may I please ask for reviews of the following small fix.
>>>
>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8199924.0/
>>>
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199924
>>>
>>> If one passes null arguments to the varargs of attach operations, they
>>> get swallowed on Solaris and following arguments will shift to lower
>>> positions.
>>>
>>> Other platform implementations handle this correctly, for instance
>>> linux:
>>>
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/file/f6ad4d73c834/src/jdk.attach/linux/cl
>> asses/sun/tools/attach/VirtualMachineImpl.java#l178
>>
>> Wouldn't it be simpler to just handle this at the Java level and
>> substitute "" for null in the args array? We're only looking at a
>> maximum of three possible entries.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Christoph
>>>



More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list