RFR: JDK-8208468: [TESTBUG] nsk/jdb/locals/locals002: fails with "Prompt is not received during ... milliseconds"

[Chris Plummer]

Looks good. I filed JDK-8210668 to address to root issue.

Chris

On 9/12/18 7:27 AM, Gary Adams wrote:
> The print statements in the locals002 test have been observed to 
> interfere
> with the output from commands, replies and prompts used in the 
> synchronization
> of operations between the debugger and debuggee. This change will 
> remove the
> print statements. A follow up bug will be filed for longer term 
> investigation of the
> character at a time output which leaves a larger window for the output 
> interruption
> that occurs.
>
>   Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208468
>
> Proposed update:
>
> diff --git 
> a/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/locals/locals002/locals002a.java 
> b/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/locals/locals002/locals002a.java
> --- 
> a/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/locals/locals002/locals002a.java
> +++ 
> b/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/locals/locals002/locals002a.java
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
>         int[]   arrVar
>                                )
>     {
> -       System.out.println("Arguments but no locals"); // 
> locals002.BREAKPOINT_LINE1
> +       int x = 3; // locals002.BREAKPOINT_LINE1
>     }
>
>     static void allKindsOfLocals()  {
> @@ -97,6 +97,6 @@
>         int[]   arrVar    = new int[5];
>
>         for (int j = 0; j < 5 ; j++) arrVar[j] = j;
> -       System.out.println("Locals but no arguments"); // 
> locals002.BREAKPOINT_LINE2
> +       int x = 4; // locals002.BREAKPOINT_LINE2
>     }
>  }
>