RFR(MS): 8222072: JVMTI GenerateEvents() sends CompiledMethodLoad events to wrong jvmtiEnv
Alex Menkov
alexey.menkov at oracle.com
Tue Apr 9 23:57:03 UTC 2019
Hi Serguei,
Maybe resolve code duplication in post_compiled_method_load(nmethod *nm)
and post_compiled_method_load(JvmtiEnv* env, nmethod *nm)?
Looks like the only difference is logging, but I don't think it's
important as old post_compiled_method_load(JvmtiEnv* env, const
jmethodID method, const jint length, ...) was not used.
--alex
On 04/09/2019 13:58, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
> Hi Jc,
>
> Thank you a lot for looking at this!
>
> On 4/9/19 9:29 AM, Jean Christophe Beyler wrote:
>> Hi Serguei,
>>
>> I saw a nit here:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2019/8222072-jvmti-GenerateEvents.1/test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/GenerateEvents/MyPackage/GenerateEventsTest.java.html
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esspitsyn/webrevs/2019/8222072-jvmti-GenerateEvents.1/test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/GenerateEvents/MyPackage/GenerateEventsTest.java.html>
>>
>> arei -> are
>
> Nice catch, fixed.
>
>> - I'm not sure you needed two files for the agents, you could have
>> re-used some of the code and just called twice GetEnv but that is a
>> detail.
>
> Right.
> I initially wanted to use this way but then decided to use two real
> agent libraries.
> Wanted to exercise this path.
>
>> - I thought JNIEnv was not supposed to be really kept because it
>> should not be used by another thread, is there not a risk that you are
>> doing that? It doesn't look like it but I've been surprised in the past
>
> You are right.
> Tried to fix it in new webrev version below.
>
>
>> - Isn't there a chance that your second agent gets a normal
>> JVMTI_EVENT_COMPILED_METHOD_LOAD before the GenerateEvents call and
>> increments its counter?
>> - I guess we'd see if it becomes flaky at some point? :)
> Yes, it is expected.
> But they should be posted on threads other than Main thread.
> The callback should ignore them.
>
>
> The updated fix version is:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2019/8222072-jvmti-GenerateEvents.2/
>
>
> Thanks!
> Serguei
>
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Jc
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:29 PM serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
>> <mailto:serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com> <serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
>> <mailto:serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Please, review a fix for:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8222072
>>
>> Webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2019/8222072-jvmti-GenerateEvents.1/
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esspitsyn/webrevs/2019/8222072-jvmti-GenerateEvents.1/>
>>
>>
>> Summary:
>> The JVMTI GenerateEvents() must send CompiledMethodLoad events
>> only to the agent which called it.
>> However, it sends events to all agents (jvmti environements)
>> which violates the JVMTI spec.
>> The webrev above fixes this issue and adds new jtreg test:
>> test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/GenerateEvents
>>
>>
>> Testing:
>> Mach5 submission for:
>> - JVMTI tests: open/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti
>> - new test: test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/GenerateEvents
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Serguei
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jc
>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list