RFR (L) 8228998: Remove the testing against NSK_FALSE from tests
Jean Christophe Beyler
jcbeyler at google.com
Thu Aug 1 23:53:14 UTC 2019
Hi Serguei,
My apologies. I fixed the forbidden on the old webrev link. Then I
rechecked the white-spaces, and made webrev not ignore white space changes.
Here is the new webrev:
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8228998/webrev.01/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8228998
Thanks for your review :)
Jc
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 4:07 PM <serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi Jc,
>
> Thank you for taking care about this!
> Most of the links in the webrev can not be resolved.
> I'm getting the error: "403 - Forbidden".
>
> The only item that works is:
>
> Cdiffs
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejcbeyler/8228998/webrev/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/unit/FollowReferences/followref001/followref001.cpp.cdiff.html>
> Udiffs
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejcbeyler/8228998/webrev/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/unit/FollowReferences/followref001/followref001.cpp.udiff.html>
> Sdiffs
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejcbeyler/8228998/webrev/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/unit/FollowReferences/followref001/followref001.cpp.sdiff.html>
> Frames
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejcbeyler/8228998/webrev/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/unit/FollowReferences/followref001/followref001.cpp.frames.html>
> Old
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejcbeyler/8228998/webrev/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/unit/FollowReferences/followref001/followref001.cpp-.html>
> New
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejcbeyler/8228998/webrev/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/unit/FollowReferences/followref001/followref001.cpp.html>
> ----- Raw
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejcbeyler/8228998/webrev/raw_files/new/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/unit/FollowReferences/followref001/followref001.cpp>
>
> *test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/unit/FollowReferences/followref001/followref001.cpp*
> Also, the patch is readable:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejcbeyler/8228998/webrev/jdk-false.changeset
>
>
> It looks pretty good.
>
> Only a one comments:
>
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejcbeyler/8228998/webrev/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/unit/FollowReferences/followref001/followref001.cpp.frames.html
>
> A couple of fragments are not aligned properly:
>
> 221 static bool getFieldsAndObjects(jvmtiEnv* jvmti,
> 222 JNIEnv* jni,
> 223 jclass debugeeClass,
> . . .
>
> 434 static bool checkTestedObjects(jvmtiEnv* jvmti,
> 435 JNIEnv* jni,
> 436 int chainLength,
> 437 ObjectDesc objectDescList[])
>
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>
> On 8/1/19 3:16 PM, Jean Christophe Beyler wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> It took me a while to pick this item back but here we go :-). Here is a
> webrev that removes all the if (.* == NSK_FALSE) and replaces them with if
> (! .*).
>
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8228998/webrev/
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8228998
>
> For the EM tests, I also updated the returns to be boolean, entirely
> removing the NSK_FALSE/NSK_TRUE parts because of the way the tests were
> done. Let me know if you'd rather I divide those up.
>
> This was tested by running the tests changed on my dev machine, I'll push
> it to the submit repo after review :-)
>
> Thanks and have a great evening,
> Jc
>
>
>
--
Thanks,
Jc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20190801/96a9dc3d/attachment.html>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list