RFR: JDK-8228547: accessibility errors in jvmti.html
Alex Menkov
alexey.menkov at oracle.com
Tue Aug 20 21:26:10 UTC 2019
Hi guys,
Thanks for review.
Once I noticed that "Phase/Callback Safe/Position/Since" and
"Phase/Event Type/Number/Enabling/Since" tables are a bit wider I cannot
"unnotice" it back :)
Bordered div's (without width specified) and bordered tables (with
width=100%) have the same width, but div with "display: table" and
"width: 100%" (we need it because otherwise it behaves like a table and
does't fill whole width) is 2px wider and this is consistent in
different browsers (firefox/chrome/IE). I tried different properties,
but was not able to remove this difference.
So I introduced workaround - one more div with right margin 2px.
Also fixed vertical alignment for the same pseudo-tables.
webrev (full):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/jdk14/jvmti_html_accessibility/webrev.2/
webrev (vs prev. version):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/jdk14/jvmti_html_accessibility/webrev2_1/
generated jvmti.html:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/jdk14/jvmti_html_accessibility/2/jvmti.html
--alex
On 08/17/2019 22:55, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi JC,
>
> On 18/08/2019 2:15 pm, Jean Christophe Beyler wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> Looks good to me as well. What is surprising (or maybe not) is the
>> slight changes that you do see. The vertical alignment is off for the
>> Position / Since columns it seems (it used to be vertically centered
>> and no longer; see the "Allocate" table for example).
>
> FWIW I don't observe any differences in that aspect of the tables
> (Firefox on Windows 7). The only visual difference I see is that the
> table lines seem thicker.
>
>> And the same table seems a bit wider on my machine than the other tables:
>> - The Phase/Callback Safe/Position/Since table seems a few pixels
>> wider than the Capabilities one for example.
>
> I see that too. To me it appears to be because there is an extra column
> in the phase/callback/position/Since table and the extra line thickness
> then makes the overall table wider.
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
>>
>> But these are really small details on my machine that I think we are
>> fine, so looks good to me too :)
>> Jc
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 12:05 AM David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com
>> <mailto:david.holmes at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> Visually this appeared fine to me, so as long as the accessibility
>> checking tool is happy then changes seem good.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>>
>> On 17/08/2019 9:46 am, Alex Menkov wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Please review the change that fixes accessibility issues in
>> generated
>> > jvmti.html
>> >
>> > There are 2 "general" accessibility issues ("content outside of a
>> > region") - fixed by replacing <div role="banner"> with <header>
>> and <div
>> > role="main"> with <main>
>> > and huge number (5200+) of table issues:
>> > - no row or column header for cells;
>> > - table has only one column or row.
>> > Most of the tables was updated to have row and column headers,
>> > the tables which does not contain table data (like "Phase/Callback
>> > Safe/Position/Since" block for functions) were converted to use
>> <div>s.
>> > All table headers/descriptions were converted to <caption>.
>> > All cases when tables can has only one row/column are handled by
>> xsl (if
>> > there is no data for the table, <div>s are used).
>> >
>> > jira: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8228547
>> >
>> > webrev:
>> >
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/jdk14/jvmti_html_accessibility/webrev/
>>
>> >
>> > generated doc:
>> > - old:
>> >
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/jdk14/jvmti_html_accessibility/0/jvmti.html
>>
>>
>> >
>> > - new:
>> >
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/jdk14/jvmti_html_accessibility/1/jvmti.html
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Visually there are minimal changes (checked in Firefox, Chrome,
>> IE)
>> >
>> > specdiff:
>> >
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/jdk14/jvmti_html_accessibility/spectdiff/diff.html
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > --alex
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jc
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list