RFR: JDK-8228547: accessibility errors in jvmti.html
serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
Tue Aug 20 23:48:29 UTC 2019
Hi Alex,
It still looks good to me.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 8/20/19 2:26 PM, Alex Menkov wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Thanks for review.
> Once I noticed that "Phase/Callback Safe/Position/Since" and
> "Phase/Event Type/Number/Enabling/Since" tables are a bit wider I
> cannot "unnotice" it back :)
>
> Bordered div's (without width specified) and bordered tables (with
> width=100%) have the same width, but div with "display: table" and
> "width: 100%" (we need it because otherwise it behaves like a table
> and does't fill whole width) is 2px wider and this is consistent in
> different browsers (firefox/chrome/IE). I tried different properties,
> but was not able to remove this difference.
> So I introduced workaround - one more div with right margin 2px.
>
> Also fixed vertical alignment for the same pseudo-tables.
>
> webrev (full):
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/jdk14/jvmti_html_accessibility/webrev.2/
>
> webrev (vs prev. version):
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/jdk14/jvmti_html_accessibility/webrev2_1/
>
>
> generated jvmti.html:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/jdk14/jvmti_html_accessibility/2/jvmti.html
>
>
> --alex
>
>
> On 08/17/2019 22:55, David Holmes wrote:
>> Hi JC,
>>
>> On 18/08/2019 2:15 pm, Jean Christophe Beyler wrote:
>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> Looks good to me as well. What is surprising (or maybe not) is the
>>> slight changes that you do see. The vertical alignment is off for
>>> the Position / Since columns it seems (it used to be vertically
>>> centered and no longer; see the "Allocate" table for example).
>>
>> FWIW I don't observe any differences in that aspect of the tables
>> (Firefox on Windows 7). The only visual difference I see is that the
>> table lines seem thicker.
>>
>>> And the same table seems a bit wider on my machine than the other
>>> tables:
>>> - The Phase/Callback Safe/Position/Since table seems a few pixels
>>> wider than the Capabilities one for example.
>>
>> I see that too. To me it appears to be because there is an extra
>> column in the phase/callback/position/Since table and the extra line
>> thickness then makes the overall table wider.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David
>>
>>>
>>> But these are really small details on my machine that I think we are
>>> fine, so looks good to me too :)
>>> Jc
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 12:05 AM David Holmes
>>> <david.holmes at oracle.com <mailto:david.holmes at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> Visually this appeared fine to me, so as long as the accessibility
>>> checking tool is happy then changes seem good.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> David
>>>
>>> On 17/08/2019 9:46 am, Alex Menkov wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > Please review the change that fixes accessibility issues in
>>> generated
>>> > jvmti.html
>>> >
>>> > There are 2 "general" accessibility issues ("content outside
>>> of a
>>> > region") - fixed by replacing <div role="banner"> with <header>
>>> and <div
>>> > role="main"> with <main>
>>> > and huge number (5200+) of table issues:
>>> > - no row or column header for cells;
>>> > - table has only one column or row.
>>> > Most of the tables was updated to have row and column headers,
>>> > the tables which does not contain table data (like
>>> "Phase/Callback
>>> > Safe/Position/Since" block for functions) were converted to use
>>> <div>s.
>>> > All table headers/descriptions were converted to <caption>.
>>> > All cases when tables can has only one row/column are handled by
>>> xsl (if
>>> > there is no data for the table, <div>s are used).
>>> >
>>> > jira: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8228547
>>> >
>>> > webrev:
>>> >
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/jdk14/jvmti_html_accessibility/webrev/
>>>
>>> >
>>> > generated doc:
>>> > - old:
>>> >
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/jdk14/jvmti_html_accessibility/0/jvmti.html
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> > - new:
>>> >
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/jdk14/jvmti_html_accessibility/1/jvmti.html
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Visually there are minimal changes (checked in Firefox,
>>> Chrome, IE)
>>> >
>>> > specdiff:
>>> >
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/jdk14/jvmti_html_accessibility/spectdiff/diff.html
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --alex
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jc
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list