RFR: 8218732: SA: Resolves ZPageAllocator::_physical incorrectly

[Stefan Karlsson]

Thanks, Erik.

Stefank

On 2019-02-14 09:26, Erik Österlund wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> Given that the remark from Jini is fixed, this looks good. I don't need 
> another webrev.
> 
> Thanks,
> /Erik
> 
> On 2019-02-11 19:09, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
>> Hi Jini,
>>
>> On 2019-02-11 19:00, Jini George wrote:
>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>
>>> Looks good to me overall. One point though.
>>>
>>> physicalFieldOffset = type.getAddressField("_physical").getOffset();
>>>
>>> Wrt the line above, is there any reason due to which 
>>> getAddressField() instead of getField() was used ? getAddressField() 
>>> is typically used when the field to be read in is a pointer. I feel 
>>> getField() might be more appropriate in this situation.
>>
>> No, this is just an oversight. I have the same issue in my later 
>> OopHandle patch. I'll change this.
>>
>> Thanks for reviewing,
>> StefanK
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jini.
>>>
>>> On 2/11/2019 1:23 PM, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Please review this small patch to resolve ZPageAllocator::_physical 
>>>> as a value object instead of a pointer.
>>>>
>>>> https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/8218732/webrev.01/
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8218732
>>>>
>>>> This fixes the Heap Parameters view.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> StefanK
>>