RFR: JDK-8215544: SA: Modify ClhsdbLauncher to add sudo privileges to enable MacOS tests on Mach5
Sharath Ballal
sharath.ballal at oracle.com
Sat Jan 12 10:08:30 UTC 2019
Hi Jini,
ClhsdbLauncher.java
1. Is the platform check not required in case of core files ?
- if (!Platform.shouldSAAttach()) {
- // Silently skip the test if we don't have enough permissions to attach
- System.out.println("SA attach not expected to work - test skipped.");
- return null;
- }
-
2. Nit: extra line at 135
Thanks,
Sharath
-----Original Message-----
From: Jini George
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2019 9:46 AM
To: JC Beyler; serviceability-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8215544: SA: Modify ClhsdbLauncher to add sudo privileges to enable MacOS tests on Mach5
Thanks again, JC! :-)
Folks, Could I please get one more review on this ?
-Jini.
On 1/11/2019 9:38 AM, JC Beyler wrote:
> Hi Jini,
>
> Looks good to me now :) Thanks for handling the comments :) Jc
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:11 PM Jini George <jini.george at oracle.com
> <mailto:jini.george at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Thank you very much for the review, JC. My comments inline:
>
> On 1/8/2019 12:22 AM, JC Beyler wrote:
> >
> >
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/8215544/webrev.03/test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/sa/ClhsdbLauncher.java.udiff.html
> > + // by appending 'sudo' to it. Check now if sudo
> > passes in this
> > + // environment with a simple 'echo' command.
> > -> Really shouldn't provide implementation details about
> what is
> > being done by that method; if we change that, this comment will
> rot :-)
> > canAddPrivileges is explicit enough in my mind
>
> Done. I have removed the comment.
>
> >
> >
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/8215544/webrev.03/test/lib/jdk/tes
> t/lib/SA/SATestUtils.java.html
>
> >
> > -> You put some System.out.println; are they intended to
> still be
> > there or were they for debug?
>
> I guess you meant this one:
> System.out.println("Adding 'sudo -E' to the command.");
>
> This one is meant to be there.
>
> >
> >
> > 77 for (String val: cmdStringList) {
> > 78 outStringList.add(val);
> > 79 }
> >
> >
> > Couldn't we use addAll ?
>
> Done.
> The modified webrev is at:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/8215544/webrev.04/index.html
>
> Thanks,
> Jini.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
> Jc
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list