JDK-8215544: SA: Modify ClhsdbLauncher to add sudo privileges to enable MacOS tests on Mach5
Jini George
jini.george at oracle.com
Mon Jan 14 05:06:38 UTC 2019
Thank you very much, Paul for the review. Yes, this is only needed for OSX.
Thanks,
Jini.
On 1/12/2019 5:41 AM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
> A more generic approach that doesn’t check for a specific platform in ClhsdbLauncher.java would be nice, e.g., add a checkForPrivileges() method to Platform, but if OSX is the only platform that needs the check, I'm ok with this patch.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
> On 1/10/19, 8:16 PM, "serviceability-dev on behalf of Jini George" <serviceability-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of jini.george at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks again, JC! :-)
>
> Folks, Could I please get one more review on this ?
>
> -Jini.
>
> On 1/11/2019 9:38 AM, JC Beyler wrote:
> > Hi Jini,
> >
> > Looks good to me now :) Thanks for handling the comments :)
> > Jc
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:11 PM Jini George <jini.george at oracle.com
> > <mailto:jini.george at oracle.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you very much for the review, JC. My comments inline:
> >
> > On 1/8/2019 12:22 AM, JC Beyler wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/8215544/webrev.03/test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/sa/ClhsdbLauncher.java.udiff.html
> > > + // by appending 'sudo' to it. Check now if sudo
> > > passes in this
> > > + // environment with a simple 'echo' command.
> > > -> Really shouldn't provide implementation details about
> > what is
> > > being done by that method; if we change that, this comment will
> > rot :-)
> > > canAddPrivileges is explicit enough in my mind
> >
> > Done. I have removed the comment.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/8215544/webrev.03/test/lib/jdk/test/lib/SA/SATestUtils.java.html
> >
> > >
> > > -> You put some System.out.println; are they intended to
> > still be
> > > there or were they for debug?
> >
> > I guess you meant this one:
> > System.out.println("Adding 'sudo -E' to the command.");
> >
> > This one is meant to be there.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > 77 for (String val: cmdStringList) {
> > > 78 outStringList.add(val);
> > > 79 }
> > >
> > >
> > > Couldn't we use addAll ?
> >
> > Done.
> > The modified webrev is at:
> >
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/8215544/webrev.04/index.html
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jini.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jc
>
>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list