RFR (12) JDK-8218025: disable pop_frame and force_early_return caps for Graal
serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com
Thu Jan 31 04:46:53 UTC 2019
Hi Alex,
Vladimir I. also mentioned the same as Igor.
One example from the runtime/thread.cpp:
#if INCLUDE_JVMCI
bool force_JVMCI_intialization = false;
if (EnableJVMCI) {
// Initialize JVMCI eagerly when it is explicitly requested.
// Or when JVMCIPrintProperties is enabled.
// The JVMCI Java initialization code will read this flag and
// do the printing if it's set.
force_JVMCI_intialization = EagerJVMCI || JVMCIPrintProperties;
if (!force_JVMCI_intialization) {
// 8145270: Force initialization of JVMCI runtime otherwise
requests for blocking
// compilations via JVMCI will not actually block until JVMCI is
initialized.
force_JVMCI_intialization = UseJVMCICompiler && (!UseInterpreter
|| !BackgroundCompilation);
}
}
#endif
One more example from prims/jni.cpp:
#if INCLUDE_JVMCI
if (EnableJVMCI) {
if (UseJVMCICompiler) {
. . .
}
}
#endif
On 1/30/19 17:34, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> UseJVMCICompiler is declared only if INCLUDE_JVMCI is defined, so your current patch will break builds where it's undefined. the rest (esp. problem list ;) ) looks good to me.
>
> adding hotspot-compiler alias.
>
> Thanks,
> -- Igor
>
>> On Jan 30, 2019, at 5:27 PM, Alex Menkov <alexey.menkov at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please review a fix for tck-red bug:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8218025
>> webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amenkov/tck_red_disable_caps/webrev/
>>
>> ForceEarlyReturn and PopFrame JCK tests intermittently fail with Graal.
>> Real fix for the issue is too risky for jdk12, so we have to disable pop_frame and force_early_return capabilities running with Graal (the capabilities are optional).
>> Currently Graal is the only compiler, so the fix checks if JVMCI compiler is enabled.
>> JCK test passes with disabled capabilities.
>> A number of hotspot tests do not check if the capabilities are enabled (as hotspot is expected to support all capabilities) and fail with Graal - they are problem-listed until the real problem (JDK-8195635) is resolved.
>>
>> --alex
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list