RFR: 8170299: Debugger does not stop inside the low memory notifications code
Daniil Titov
daniil.x.titov at oracle.com
Mon Jul 8 23:11:44 UTC 2019
Hi David,
Sure, I will put it on hold till you are back from the vacations.
Webrev: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8170299/webrev.02/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170299
Have a nice vacations!
Best regards,
Daniil
On 7/3/19, 11:47 PM, "David Holmes" <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
Hi Daniil,
On 4/07/2019 1:04 pm, Daniil Titov wrote:
> Please review the change the fixes the problem with the debugger not stopping in the low memory notification code.
>
> The problem here is that the ServiceThread that calls these MXBean listeners is hidden from the external view that prevents the debugger from stopping in it.
>
> The fix introduces new NotificationThread that is visible to the external view and offloads the ServiceThread from sending low memory and other notifications that could result in Java calls ( GC and diagnostic commands notifications) by moving these activities in this new NotificationThread.
There is a long and unfortunate history with this bug.
The original incarnation of this fix was introducing a new thread at the
Java library level, and I had some concerns about that:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2017-December/022612.html
That effort was resurrected at:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2018-July/024466.html
and
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2018-August/024849.html
but was left somewhat in limbo. There was a lot of doubt about the right
way to fix this bug and whether introducing a new thread was too disruptive.
But introducing a new thread in the VM also has the same set of
concerns! This needs consideration by the runtime team before going
ahead. Introducing a new thread likes this needs to be examined in
detail - particularly the synchronization interactions with other
threads. It also introduces another monitor designated safepoint-never
at a time when we are in the process of cleaning up monitors so that
JavaThreads will only use safepoint-check-always monitors.
Unfortunately I'm about to head out for two weeks vacation, and a number
of other key runtime folk are also on vacation. but I'd ask that you
hold off on this until we can look at it in more detail.
Thanks,
David
-----
> Testing: Mach5 tier1,tier2 and tier3 tests succeeded.
>
> Webrev: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8170299/webrev.01/
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170299
>
> Thanks!
> --Daniil
>
>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list