RFR 8228596: Class redefinition fails when condy instructions are removed

[Harold Seigel]

Thanks Serguei!

Harold

On 7/26/2019 2:44 PM, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
> Hi Harold,
>
> This looks good to me.
> Added the serviceability-dev mailing list.
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>
> On 7/26/19 05:04, Harold Seigel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review this small JDK-14 fix for an issue with constant pool 
>> merging when redefining a class whose constant pool contains a 
>> constant dynamic entry.  The fix makes sure that the 
>> has_dynamic_constant flag gets copied properly to the merged constant 
>> pool.
>>
>> Open Webrev: 
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8228596/webrev/index.html
>>
>> JBS Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8228596
>>
>> The fix was regression tested by running Mach5 tiers 1 and 2 tests 
>> and builds on Linux-x64, Solaris, Windows, and Mac OS X, by running 
>> Mach5 tiers 3-5 tests on Linux-x64, and JCK lang and VM tests on 
>> Linux-x64.
>>
>> Thanks, Harold
>>
>