RFR: JDK-8218166: [Graal] com/sun/jdi/SimulResumerTest.java failure
Gary Adams
gary.adams at oracle.com
Tue Mar 12 18:07:17 UTC 2019
Still need 2 more reviewers ...
On 3/7/19, 9:45 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> Gary,
>
> Since the 'graal' label was recently removed, I also removed "[Graal]"
> from the bug synopsis. Please make sure you update your commit mesg.
>
>
> On 3/7/19 8:19 AM, Gary Adams wrote:
>> While trying to reproduce the timeout reported in
>> JDK-8000669: com/sun/jdi/SimulResumerTest.java times out
>>
>> I was unable to reproduce the timeout failure, but I did occasionally
>> see the ObjectCollectedException. The output from the test is very
>> verbose
>> and may be the source of the occasional timeout. I'd like to close
>> JDK-8000669
>> as cannot reproduce and if it shows up again look into limiting the
>> amount
>> of non-essential output from the test.
>>
>> This is a racy test to begin with and it already is ignoring exceptions
>> due to unexpected thread states. Adding the ignore for
>> ObjectCollectedException
>> allows the test to complete without errors.
>>
>> The graal label was recently removed. We should also remove it from
>> the summary.
>>
>> Proposed changeset:
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/test/jdk/com/sun/jdi/SimulResumerTest.java
>> b/test/jdk/com/sun/jdi/SimulResumerTest.java
>> --- a/test/jdk/com/sun/jdi/SimulResumerTest.java
>> +++ b/test/jdk/com/sun/jdi/SimulResumerTest.java
>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>> /*
>> - * Copyright (c) 2008, 2015, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All
>> rights reserved.
>> + * Copyright (c) 2008, 2019, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All
>> rights reserved.
>> * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
>> *
>> * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>> @@ -211,6 +211,8 @@
>>
>> } catch (IncompatibleThreadStateException ee) {
>> // ignore
>> + } catch (ObjectCollectedException ee) {
>> + // ignore
>> } catch (VMDisconnectedException ee) {
>> // This is how we stop. The debuggee runs to
>> completion
>> // and we get this exception.
>
> There should be some sort of comment explaining why it is okay to ignore
> the ObjectCollectedException. When the IncompatibleThreadStateException
> was ignored, there should have been a comment added for that also.
>
> Dan
>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list