RFR (M) 8223040: Add a AGCT test

[Daniel D. Daugherty]

I would use "AsyncGetCallTrace" for the top level directory name.
That would make it easier for someone searching the test space...

Dan


On 5/2/19 7:03 PM, Jean Christophe Beyler wrote:
> Hi Serguei,
>
> Thanks for the review, I fixed the bug name but have not yet changed 
> the webrev. Does anyone else have an opinion of the naming of the tests?
>
> Thanks all!
> Jc
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 5:10 PM <serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com 
> <mailto:serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Jc,
>
>     I'd suggest to change the bug title to be:
>        Add a AsyncGetCallTrace test
>
>     I'm not sure about the test names.
>     Maybe, it is Okay to keep the AGCT abbreviation.
>     But I'd like to hear other opinions.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Serguei
>
>     On 4/30/19 3:47 PM, Jean Christophe Beyler wrote:
>>     Hi all,
>>
>>     As I start looking at working on the AGCT bugs, I wanted to at
>>     least start creating a baseline of tests for AGCT. This is an
>>     attempt to just have a "base" test (and infrastructure) that
>>     tries to call AGCT and get back some sane information.
>>
>>     Next step will be to add a few more tests that will be exposing
>>     the limitations of
>>     https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8178287 for example.
>>
>>     Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8223040/webrev.00/
>>     <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejcbeyler/8223040/webrev.00/>
>>     Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223040
>>
>>     This passed the test on my linux machine (the test is only for
>>     linux due to the dlsym) and the submit-repo.
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>     Jc
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Thanks,
> Jc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20190502/01817fb1/attachment.html>