RFR (M) 8223040: Add a AGCT test
Jean Christophe Beyler
jcbeyler at google.com
Fri May 3 00:28:36 UTC 2019
:)
Sounds good to me and here is the new webrev with that naming scheme:
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8223040/webrev.01/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223040
Thanks for your help!
Jc
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 5:16 PM <serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/2/19 5:13 PM, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
>
> God suggestion!
>
>
> Above is a typo, I wanted to say "Good suggestion".
> But the typo is funny. :)
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
> On 5/2/19 4:55 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>
> I would use "AsyncGetCallTrace" for the top level directory name.
> That would make it easier for someone searching the test space...
>
> Dan
>
>
> On 5/2/19 7:03 PM, Jean Christophe Beyler wrote:
>
> Hi Serguei,
>
> Thanks for the review, I fixed the bug name but have not yet changed the
> webrev. Does anyone else have an opinion of the naming of the tests?
>
> Thanks all!
> Jc
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 5:10 PM <serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jc,
>>
>> I'd suggest to change the bug title to be:
>> Add a AsyncGetCallTrace test
>>
>> I'm not sure about the test names.
>> Maybe, it is Okay to keep the AGCT abbreviation.
>> But I'd like to hear other opinions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Serguei
>>
>> On 4/30/19 3:47 PM, Jean Christophe Beyler wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As I start looking at working on the AGCT bugs, I wanted to at least
>> start creating a baseline of tests for AGCT. This is an attempt to just
>> have a "base" test (and infrastructure) that tries to call AGCT and get
>> back some sane information.
>>
>> Next step will be to add a few more tests that will be exposing the
>> limitations of https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8178287 for
>> example.
>>
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jcbeyler/8223040/webrev.00/
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223040
>>
>> This passed the test on my linux machine (the test is only for linux due
>> to the dlsym) and the submit-repo.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jc
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
> Jc
>
>
>
>
>
--
Thanks,
Jc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20190502/2f1994cb/attachment.html>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list