RFR(S) 8231986 [SA] Consolidate parts of the Linux and MacOSX versions of ps_core.c

[Chris Plummer]

Ok. Good to go then.

Chris

On 10/9/19 2:03 PM, Ioi Lam wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Thanks for the review. I moved the declaration of n and m to inside 
> the "if" block. For ps_pread vs ps_pdread, I am not sure why the 
> symbol is different on mac vs linux. Maybe the purpose is to avoid 
> conflicting with built-in symbols on the platform? Since this function 
> is used by other parts of SA, I think I'll just leave it as is.
>
> Thanks
> - Ioi
>
>
> On 10/9/19 11:39 AM, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> Hi Ioi,
>>
>> Overall the changes look fine. A couple of minor things:
>>
>> Any reason not to fix the ps_pread/ps_pdread naming issue rather than 
>> just map it with a #define?
>>
>> In init_classsharing_workaround(), I think the "n" and "m" 
>> declarations should be inside the "if" block.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> On 10/7/19 11:37 PM, Ioi Lam wrote:
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231986
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iklam/jdk14/8231986-consolidate-ps-core.v01/ 
>>>
>>>
>>> One of my upcoming CDS changes (JDK-8231610) would affect the 
>>> duplicated code
>>> in these 2 files. So instead of fixing the same thing twice, I have 
>>> moved the
>>> duplicated parts of these files that are related to CDS into a 
>>> common file.
>>> This would simplify future maintenance of CDS+SA code.
>>>
>>> To make my life simple, I just moved all functions up to 
>>> init_classsharing_workaround().
>>> The remaining lines of the these 2 files seem to be unrelated to 
>>> hotspot (core file
>>> handling, elf, etc), so they probably don't need to be changed any 
>>> time soon. I'll leave
>>> the duplications there as is.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> - Ioi
>>
>