RFR (S): 8227563: jvmti/scenarios/contention/TC05/tc05t001 fails ...

[David Holmes]

Thanks Alex.

david

On 6/09/2019 3:36 am, Alex Menkov wrote:
> Looks reasonable.
> 
> --alex
> 
> On 09/04/2019 23:43, David Holmes wrote:
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227563
>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8227563/webrev/
>>
>> See bug report for gory details. Basically on Windows thread-cpu-time 
>> may only get updated at the resolution of the timer interrupt, which 
>> may be as long as 16ms. The test checks that the elapsed cpu time is < 
>> 10ms and so would fail if the first and second calls to get the time 
>> straddled a timer interrupt (and normally it passes because both calls 
>> return zero).
>>
>> Fix is to bump the allowed time to 16ms on Windows.
>>
>> I also corrected a comment as to why part of the test is already 
>> disabled on Windows, and enabled verbose logging so that if this test 
>> fails again it will be much easier to see why.
>>
>> Testing: itself, on Windows numerous times
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David