RFR (M): 8231209: [REDO] ThreadMXBean::getThreadAllocatedBytes() can be quicker for self thread

Mandy Chung mandy.chung at oracle.com
Tue Sep 24 03:28:49 UTC 2019


Looks fine.

I added myself to the CSR reviewer.  I don't categorize it as source 
incompatibility as other implementation outside JDK is not supported.  I 
took the liberty to edit the compatibility kind.

Mandy

On 9/23/19 5:42 PM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
> Update:
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231209
> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231374
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8231209/webrev.01/
>
> All test suites that reference getThreadAllocatedBytes pass. These are
>
> hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/monitoring (contained the failing test)
> jdk/com/sun/management
> jdk/jdk/jfr/event/runtime
>
> Per Mandy, the default getCurrentThreadAllocatedBytes implementation throws a UOE.
>
> The CSR is a copy of the original, and in addition points out that ThreadMXBean is a PlatformManagedObject, why that's important, and why a default getCurrentThreadAllocatedBytes implementation is necessary.
>
> I changed the nsk test to make sure that the approach it uses will work with getCurrentThreadAllocatedBytes, which per Mandy is defined as a property. Though I'm happy to remove it if there's a consensus it isn't needed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
> On 9/19/19, 11:03 PM, "serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com" <serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>      Hi Paul,
>      
>      I have almost the same comments as David:
>        - the same two spots of changes identified
>        - the addition of the default method was expected
>        - the change in test is a surprise (I also doubt, it is really needed)
>        - new CSR is needed
>      
>      
>      Sorry, I forgot to remind about running the vmTestbase monitoring tests. :(
>      
>      Thanks,
>      Serguei
>      
>      
>      On 9/19/19 16:06, David Holmes wrote:
>      > Hi Paul,
>      >
>      > On 20/09/2019 2:52 am, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
>      >> More formally,
>      >>
>      >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231209
>      >> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8231209/webrev.00/
>      >
>      > I'm assuming there are only two changes here:
>      >
>      > 1. The new method is now a default method that throws UOE.
>      >
>      > That seems fine.
>      >
>      > 2. You implemented the new method in the test class.
>      >
>      > I don't understand why you did that. The test can't be calling the new
>      > method. Now that it is a default method we will get past the
>      > compilation failure that caused the problem. So no change to the test
>      > should be needed AFAICS.
>      >
>      > A new CSR request is needed. Just copy everything across from the old,
>      > with the updated spec. But please also mention this is a
>      > PlatformManagedObject in the compatibility discussion.
>      >
>      > Thanks,
>      > David
>      >
>      >> Thanks,
>      >>
>      >> On 9/19/19, 9:44 AM, "serviceability-dev on behalf of Hohensee,
>      >> Paul" <serviceability-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of
>      >> hohensee at amazon.com> wrote:
>      >>
>      >>      Off by 2 error. Changed the subject to reflect 8231209.
>      >>           http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8231209/webrev.00/
>      >>           Paul
>      >>           On 9/19/19, 6:31 AM, "Daniel D. Daugherty"
>      >> <daniel.daugherty at oracle.com> wrote:
>      >>                > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8231211/webrev.00/
>      >>                   The redo bug is 8231209. 8231211 is closed as a dup
>      >> of 8231210.
>      >>                   Dan
>      >>                            On 9/19/19 9:17 AM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
>      >>          > I'll have the default method throw UOE. That's the same as
>      >> the other default methods do.
>      >>          >
>      >>          > The necessary test fix is in
>      >> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/monitoring/share/server/ServerThreadMXBeanNew.java,
>      >> which needs a new getCurrentThreadAllocatedBytes method, defined as
>      >>          >
>      >>          >      public long getCurrentThreadAllocatedBytes() {
>      >>          >          return (Long)
>      >> invokeMethod("getCurrentThreadAllocatedBytes",
>      >>          >              new Object[] { },
>      >>          >              new String[] { });
>      >>          >      }
>      >>          >
>      >>          > With this fix, the 134 tests in
>      >> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/monitoring/ThreadMXBean pass.
>      >> Preliminary webrev at
>      >>          >
>      >>          > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8231211/webrev.00/
>      >>          >
>      >>          > Is it worth adding getCurrentThreadAllocatedBytes tests to
>      >> the
>      >> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/monitoring/ThreadMXBean/GetThreadAllocatedBytes
>      >> set?
>      >>          >
>      >>          > Paul
>      >>          >
>      >>          > On 9/18/19, 8:16 PM, "David Holmes"
>      >> <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
>      >>          >
>      >>          >      On 19/09/2019 12:57 pm, Mandy Chung wrote:
>      >>          >      > On 9/18/19 5:00 PM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
>      >>          >      >> They all implement
>      >> com.sun.management.ThreadMXBean, so adding a
>      >>          >      >> getCurrentThreadAllocatedBytes broke them.
>      >> Potential fix is to give it
>      >>          >      >> a default implementation, vis
>      >>          >      >>
>      >>          >      >>      public default long
>      >> getCurrentThreadAllocatedBytes() {
>      >>          >      >>          return -1;
>      >>          >      >>      }
>      >>          >      >>
>      >>          >      >
>      >>          >      > com.sun.management.ThreadMXBean (and other platform
>      >> MXBeans) is a
>      >>          >      > "sealed" interface which should only be implemented
>      >> by JDK.
>      >>          >
>      >>          >      Didn't realize that. I don't recall knowing about
>      >> PlatformManagedObject.
>      >>          >      Sealed types will at least allow this to be enforced,
>      >> though I have to
>      >>          >      wonder what the tests are doing here.
>      >>          >
>      >>          >      > Unfortunately we don't have the sealed type feature
>      >> yet.  Yes it needs
>      >>          >      > to be a default method.  I think it should throw UOE.
>      >>          >      >
>      >>          >      >       * @implSpec
>      >>          >      >       * The default implementation throws {@code
>      >>          >      > UnsupportedOperationException}.
>      >>          >      >
>      >>          >      > The @throw UOE can make it clear that it does not
>      >> support current thread
>      >>          >      > memory allocation measurement.
>      >>          >
>      >>          >      Yes that seems a reasonable default if we don't want
>      >> this to be
>      >>          >      implemented outside the platform.
>      >>          >
>      >>          >      Thanks,
>      >>          >      David
>      >>          >
>      >>          >      > Mandy
>      >>          >
>      >>          >
>      >>
>      
>      
>



More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list