RFR: jsr166 integration 2019-09
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Tue Sep 24 06:06:06 UTC 2019
Except when I run it through our test system ReservedStackTest is still
failing :(
I tested it initially when Fred proposed it and that went fine. It also
passes for me locally on Linux.
David
On 24/09/2019 12:20 pm, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> That all seems fine to me.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On 24/09/2019 3:43 am, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>> We now have a fix-up integration that removes all the previously
>> excluded tests from their exclude lists.
>>
>> https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/jdk/jsr166-integration/overview.html
>>
>>
>> 8231031: runtime/ReservedStack/ReservedStackTest.java fails after
>> jsr166 refresh
>> https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/jdk/jsr166-integration/ReservedStackTest/index.html
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231031
>>
>> LockInfo objects now restored to their previous values (although David
>> was looking at future improvements).
>>
>> 8231032: ThreadMXBean locking tests fail after JSR 166 refresh
>> https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/jdk/jsr166-integration/wrong-blocker/index.html
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231032
>>
>> 8231036: vmTestbase monitoring tests fail after JSR 166 refresh
>> https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/jdk/jsr166-integration/SynchronizerLockingThreads/index.html
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231036
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list