RFR: 8248362: JVMTI frame operations should use Thread-Local Handshake
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Thu Jul 23 02:01:36 UTC 2020
Hi Yasumasa,
On 23/07/2020 12:38 am, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please review this change:
>
> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8248362
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8248362/webrev.00/
>
> Migrate JVMTI frame operations to Thread-Local Handshakes from VM
> Operations.
>
> - VM_GetFrameCount
> - VM_GetFrameLocation
>
> They affects both GetFrameCount() and GetFrameLocation() JVMTI functions.
Your changes all seem fine.
But I'm a bit confused about the existing code. In
JvmtiEnv::GetFrameLocation we have:
if (java_thread == JavaThread::current()) {
err = get_frame_location(java_thread, depth, method_ptr,
location_ptr);
but then in get_frame_location we have:
assert((SafepointSynchronize::is_at_safepoint() ||
java_thread->is_thread_fully_suspended(false, &debug_bits)),
"at safepoint or target thread is suspended");
and that assert must surely fire if called by the current thread for
itself! ???
Thanks,
David
> This change has passed all tests on submit repo
> (mach5-one-ysuenaga-JDK-8248362-20200722-1249-12859056), and
> vmTestbase/nsk/{jdi,jdw,jvmti}, serviceability/{jdwp,jvmti} .
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yasumasa
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list