[15?] RFR (S): 8249192: MonitorInfo stores raw oops across safepoints
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Thu Jul 23 12:05:53 UTC 2020
Hi Thomas,
Incrementals looks good to me.
Thanks,
David
-----
On 23/07/2020 7:39 pm, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> Hi Dan and Serguei,
>
> thanks for your reviews.
>
> On 22.07.20 19:04, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>> jdk15:
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/8249192/webrev.jdk15.2/ (full)
>>
>> src/hotspot/share/prims/jvmtiEnvBase.cpp
>> old L1029: ResourceMark rm;
>> It's not clear (to me anyway) why this ResourceMark is removed.
>>
>> Update: I saw the discussion of "ResourceMark rm" in JDK15
>> versus
>> "ResourceMark rm(current_thread)" in JDK16, but that doesn't
>> tell
>> me why it was necessary to remove that ResourceMark.
>
> The method that is guarded by this ResourceMark contains the necessary
> ResourceMark itself, so I removed it.
>
>>
>> src/hotspot/share/prims/stackwalk.cpp
>> L291: ResourceMark rm;
>> L292: HandleMark hm;
>> Since there's a TRAPS parameter, these should be 'rm(THREAD)'
>> and
>> 'hm(THREAD)'.
>>
>> src/hotspot/share/runtime/biasedLocking.cpp
>> No comments.
>>
>> src/hotspot/share/runtime/deoptimization.cpp
>> No comments.
>>
>> src/hotspot/share/runtime/vframe.cpp
>> L461: _lock = lock;
>> nit - extra space before '='.
>>
>> src/hotspot/share/runtime/vframe.hpp
>> L32: #include "runtime/handles.inline.hpp"
>> nit - new include is out of order; should be after frame.hpp.
>>
>> src/hotspot/share/runtime/vframeArray.cpp
>> No comments.
>>
>> src/hotspot/share/runtime/vframe_hp.cpp
>> Skipped - no changes.
>>
>> src/hotspot/share/services/threadService.cpp
>> No comments.
>>
>
> All fixed, and incorporating Serguei's changes in the other email as well.
>
> jdk16:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/8249192/webrev.3/ (full)
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/8249192/webrev.2_to_3/ (diff)
>
> jdk15:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/8249192/webrev.jdk15.3/ (full)
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/8249192/webrev.jdk15.2_to_3/ (diff)
>
> Note that the jdk15 change will only go into 15.0.2 as discussion with
> the release team showed that the change is too risky for earlier
> releases. See the relevant CR comment for details.
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list