JDK 16 RFR of JDK-8250640: Address reliance on default constructors in jdk.jdi

[Alan Bateman]

On 27/07/2020 21:42, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Another module, another set of default constructors to replace with 
> explicit ones. Please review the code changes and CSR to address:
>
>     JDK-8250640: Address reliance on default constructors in jdk.jdi
>     webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8250640.0/
>     CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250642
>
> Patch below; I'll update copyrights before pushing. In the Bootstrap 
> class, since it doesn't define any non-static methods, it looks like 
> it doesn't need a constructor in its API at all so I terminally 
> deprecated the constructor.
Right, Bootstrap should have a public constructor. Ideally the abstract 
classes in the spi package would have a protected constructor.

The change looks okay to me.

-Alan