RFR(T): 8247495: ProblemList vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/SetFieldAccessWatch/setfldw001/TestDescription.java

[Daniel D. Daugherty]

On 6/12/20 2:49 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> What's the criteria for "noise".

There is no specific criteria that I'm aware of.

It popped up in today's JDK15 testing so it got on my radar (again).


> I don't consider the failures for this test as noisy. I only see 3 in 
> mach5 CI testing for all of JDK 15. JDK 14 does  appear to have been 
> somewhat noisy, possibly enough so that it looks like maybe something 
> changed to reduce the number of failures in 15. In any case, do you 
> plan on backporting to 14?

This failure has been around in one form or another since JDK7. If someone
decides to fix it, then they can un-ProblemList it.

I'm planning to push it to JDK15 and JDK16. Those two releases are the focus
of my CI noise reduction efforts. I don't monitor the JDK14u CI...

May I proceed with the ProblemListing?

Dan

>
> thanks,
>
> Chris
>
> On 6/12/20 9:46 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> It's time to reduce the noise in the CI so I'm ProblemListing tests.
>>
>> Here's the bug for failure:
>>
>>     JDK-8205957 setfldw001/TestDescription.java fails with bad field 
>> value
>>     https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205957
>>
>> and here's the bug for the ProblemListing:
>>
>>     JDK-8247495 ProblemList 
>> vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/SetFieldAccessWatch/setfldw001/TestDescription.java
>>     https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8247495
>>
>> I'm considering this a trivial change so I need a single (R)eviewer.
>>
>> Here's the context diff for the change:
>>
>> $ hg diff
>> diff -r 015533451f4c test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt
>> --- a/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt    Fri Jun 12 09:31:08 2020 
>> -0700
>> +++ b/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt    Fri Jun 12 12:40:17 2020 
>> -0400
>> @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@
>>  vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI05/ji05t001/TestDescription.java 
>> 8219652 aix-ppc64
>>  vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/jni_interception/JI06/ji06t001/TestDescription.java 
>> 8219652 aix-ppc64
>>  vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/SetJNIFunctionTable/setjniftab001/TestDescription.java 
>> 8219652 aix-ppc64
>> +vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/SetFieldAccessWatch/setfldw001/TestDescription.java 
>> 8205957 generic-all
>>
>>  vmTestbase/gc/lock/jni/jnilock002/TestDescription.java 
>> 8208243,8192647 generic-all
>>
>>
>> This issue is actually much older than JDK-8205957 would indicate
>> (first sighting in JDK11 for that bug ID). The older version of
>> the test is covered by https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6528079
>> and that failures first sighting is in JDK7.
>>
>>
>> Thanks, in advance, for any comments, questions, or suggestions.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>
>