RFR(T) 8203005: The top-of-stack type specified for nofast_* bytecodes are wrong
Chris Plummer
chris.plummer at oracle.com
Thu Jun 25 18:37:23 UTC 2020
Nevermind. I should have looked at your full webrev. I see you already
covered this.
thanks,
Chris
On 6/25/20 11:28 AM, Chris Plummer wrote:
> Hi Yumin,
>
> It looks like the fix for
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8174995 has this same bug.
> What do you think?
>
> thanks,
>
> Chris
>
> On 6/25/20 10:33 AM, Yumin Qi wrote:
>> Hi, please review the tiny changes for
>>
>> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8203005
>>
>> webrev:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~minqi/2020/8203005/webrev-00/
>>
>>
>> Summary: The change was left by
>> 8074345(https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074345), the types
>> were wrongly put as T_ILLEGAL for T_OBJECT, and T_ILLEGAL for T_INT.
>> This has not triggered any failures yet since the types stored in the
>> type array for nofast version are never used, the used types are
>> always the original types fortunately(unfortunately either).
>>
>>
>> tests: tier1,tier2,tier3
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Yumin
>>
>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list