RFR (T) 8241320: The ClassLoaderData::_is_unsafe_anonymous field is unused in the SA
coleen.phillimore at oracle.com
coleen.phillimore at oracle.com
Fri Mar 20 19:28:36 UTC 2020
On 3/20/20 11:11 AM, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
>
> On 3/20/20 04:28, coleen.phillimore at oracle.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/19/20 6:43 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>>> Hi Coleen,
>>>
>>> On 20/03/2020 5:46 am, coleen.phillimore at oracle.com wrote:
>>>> Summary: remove unused code that is changing in Hotspot for hidden
>>>> classes.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure how to identify unused code in the SA given that it
>>> exposes a Java API for querying the JVM internals. You say
>>> getisUnsafeAnonymous() is unused because nothing in the SA calls it.
>>> But the same would seem to be true for other parts of the CLD API -
>>> for example
>>>
>>> - ClassLoaderData::dictionary() is called from
>>> - ClassLoaderData::allEntriesDo, is called from
>>> - ClassLoaderDataGraph::allEntriesDo, is called from
>>> - nowhere ???
>>
>> Actually I had a look at that too because, of course, I was trying to
>> remove more. I think there is a caller for that:
>>
>> utilities/soql/sa.js:
>> sa.sysDict["allEntriesDo(sun.jvm.hotspot.classfile.ClassLoaderDataGraph.ClassAndLoaderVisitor)"](visitor);
>>
>> But I don't know what the java script interface to SA is. So I
>> thought I'd leave it for now. It might actually be useful
>> theoretically.
>
I had second thoughts about it being useful from SA. I think if we
wanted to see what classes were loaded in the system dictionary for each
loader, we could write a pretty simple python script from within gdb to
do so.
Coleen
> We have a plan to remove the java script support from SA.
> Chris P. investigated this and, probably, can tell more.
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Coleen
>>
>>>
>>> David
>>> -----
>>>
>>>> Ran tier1-3 tests. See bug for more details.
>>>>
>>>> open webrev at
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/2020/8241320.01/webrev
>>>> bug link https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241320
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Coleen
>>
>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list