RFR (XS) 8241750: x86_32 build failure after JDK-8227269
Chris Plummer
chris.plummer at oracle.com
Fri Mar 27 17:15:55 UTC 2020
Yeah, I think given that it fixes a broken build it should be fine to
push right away.
Chris
On 3/27/20 10:10 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Thanks! Trivial, right?
>
> If so, I'll push as soon as jdk-submit clears.
>
> -Aleksey
>
> On 3/27/20 6:08 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> On 3/27/20 10:03 AM, Roman Kennke wrote:
>>> Looks good to me, thanks!
>>>
>>> Roman
>>>
>>>> Bug:
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241750
>>>>
>>>> Fix:
>>>>
>>>> diff -r fef47d126675 src/jdk.jdwp.agent/share/native/libjdwp/classTrack.c
>>>> --- a/src/jdk.jdwp.agent/share/native/libjdwp/classTrack.c Fri Mar 27 15:33:24 2020 +0100
>>>> +++ b/src/jdk.jdwp.agent/share/native/libjdwp/classTrack.c Fri Mar 27 17:47:31 2020 +0100
>>>> @@ -70,5 +70,5 @@
>>>> return;
>>>> }
>>>> - *(char**)bagAdd(deletedSignatures) = (char*)tag;
>>>> + *(char**)bagAdd(deletedSignatures) = (char*)jlong_to_ptr(tag);
>>>>
>>>> debugMonitorExit(classTrackLock);
>>>> @@ -118,5 +118,5 @@
>>>> EXIT_ERROR(error,"signature");
>>>> }
>>>> - error = JVMTI_FUNC_PTR(trackingEnv, SetTag)(env, klass, (jlong)signature);
>>>> + error = JVMTI_FUNC_PTR(trackingEnv, SetTag)(env, klass, ptr_to_jlong(signature));
>>>> if (error != JVMTI_ERROR_NONE) {
>>>> jvmtiDeallocate(signature);
>>>>
>>>> Testing: Linux {x86_64, x86_32} x {builds, vmTestbase_nsk_jdwp}; jdk-submit (running)
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list