RFR: 8240698: LingeredApp does not pass getTestJavaOpts() to the children process if vmArguments is already specified

Leonid Mesnik leonid.mesnik at oracle.com
Tue Mar 31 00:42:11 UTC 2020


Hi

See my comments inline. I will update webrev after go through all your 
comments.


On 3/30/20 11:39 AM, Chris Plummer wrote:
> Hi Leonid,
>
> I haven't gone through all the tests yet.  I've accumulated enough 
> questions that I'd like to see them answered or addressed before I 
> continue on.
>
> This isn't directly related to your changes, but I noticed that users 
> of JDKToolLauncher do nothing to make sure that default test options 
> are used. This means we are never running these tools with the test 
> options being specified with the jtreg run. Is that a bug or intentional?

Which "default test options" do you mean? We have 2 properties to set 
JVM options. The idea is to pass test.vm.opts to ALL java processes and 
test.java.opts  to only tested processes if applicable. Usually, for 
example we don't want to run jcmd with -Xcomp. test.vm.opts was used (a 
long time ago) for options like '-d32/-d64' on Solaris where JVM don't 
start without choosing correct version. Also, it is used to reduce 
maximum heap for all JVM instances when tests are running concurrently.

So, probably test.vm.opts (or test.vm.tools.opts) should be added by 
JDKToolLauncher but not test.java.opts. It is separate topic, there are 
a lot of launchers which ignore test.vm.opts now.

>
> In the problem lists, is it necessary to list the test multiple times 
> with #id0, #id1, etc, or could you list it just once and leave that 
> part off. It seems very error prone. Also, changing tests like 
> ClhsdbFindPC, ClhsdbJstack, and ClhsdbScanOops to split out the 
> testing in this manner seems completely unrelated to this CR, 
> especially when the tests do not even contain any changes related to 
> the CR.

I think, that these chages are related. The startApp(...) was updated so 
some test combinations become invalid or redundant.

ClhsdbFindPC and ClhsdbJstack were always run twice. Now, when test 
options passed in test it is not needed to run it twice when Xcomp is 
already set by user.

ClhsdbScanOops is fixed to don't allow to run incompatible GC combination.

So I should update these tests by splitting them or change them to  
startAppExactJvmOpts() if we wan't continue to ignore user-given test 
options.

It seems that #idN are required by jtreg now, otherwise it just run test.

>
>  426     public static LingeredApp startApp(String... 
> additionalJvmOpts) throws IOException {
>
> The default test opts are appended to additionalJvmOpts, and if you 
> want prepended you need to call Utils.prependTestJavaOpts(). I would 
> have thought the opposite would be more desirable and expected default 
> behavior. Why did you choose this way? I also find it somewhat 
> confusing that there is even a default mode for where the 
> additionalJvmOpts go. Maybe it would be best to have 
> startAppAppendJvmArgs() and startAppPrependJvmArgs() just to make it 
> explicit. This would also be in line with the existing 
> startAppExactJvmOpts().
>
I've chosen the most popular usage, which was Utils.appendTestJavaOpts. 
But I agree, that it would be better to change it to prepend. Thanks for 
pointing to this.

I don't want to add startAppAppendJvmArgs()/startAppPrependJvmArgs() to 
don't complicate all things. I think that startApp() should be used in 
the cases when test vm options really shouldn't interfere with 
user-provided options or overwrite them. So basically the behavior is 
the same as for ProcessTools.createJavaProcessBuilder(true, ...) and 
jtreg itself.


> Is ClhsdbFindPC correct. It used to use just use -Xcomp or -Xint, 
> ignoring any default test opts. You've fixed it to include the default 
> test opts, but the are appended, possibly overriding the -Xcomp or 
> -Xint. Don't we want the default test opts prepended? Same for 
> ClhsdbJstack.

The idea is to don't mix Xcomp and Xmixed/Xint using requires filter. 
However ClhsdbFindPC might override Xint with Xmixed if it is set 
explicitly. Switching to prepending will fix it.

Leonid

>
> thanks,
>
> Chris
>
> On 3/25/20 2:31 PM, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
>>
>> Igor, Stefan, Ioi
>>
>> Thank you for your feedback.
>>
>> Filed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241624 To change @run 
>> main... to @run driver.
>>
>> Test ClhsdbJstack.java is updated.
>>
>> Still waiting for review from SVC team.
>>
>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lmesnik/8240698/webrev.02/
>>
>> Leonid
>>
>> On 3/25/20 12:46 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>>> Hi Leonid,
>>>
>>> not related related to your patch (but yet somewhat made more 
>>> obvious by it), it seems all (or at least almost all) the tests 
>>> which use�LingeredApp should be run in "driver" mode as they just 
>>> orchestrate execution of other JVMs, so running them w/ main (let 
>>> alone main/othervm) just wastes time, 
>>> test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/sa/ClhsdbJstack.java#id1, for 
>>> example, will now executed w/ Xcomp which will make it very slow for 
>>> no reasons. since you already got your hands dirty w/ these tests, 
>>> could you please file an RFE to sort this out and list all the 
>>> affected tests there?
>>>
>>> re: the patch, could you please update ClhsdbJstack.java test not to 
>>> be run w/ Xcomp and follow the same pattern you used in other tests 
>>> (e.g.�ClhsdbScanOops) ? other than that it looks fine to me, I 
>>> however wouldn't be able to tell if all svc tests continue to do 
>>> that they were supposed to, so I'd prefer for someone from svc team 
>>> to�chime in.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -- Igor
>>>
>>>> On Mar 25, 2020, at 12:01 PM, Leonid Mesnik 
>>>> <leonid.mesnik at oracle.com <mailto:leonid.mesnik at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Added Ioi, who also proposed new version of startAppVmOpts.
>>>>
>>>> Please find new webrev: 
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lmesnik/8240698/webrev.01/
>>>>
>>>> Renamed startAppVmOpts/runAppVmOpts to 
>>>> "startAppExactJvmOpts/runAppExactJvmOpts" is used. It should make 
>>>> very clear that this method doesn't use any of test.java.opts, 
>>>> test.vm.opts.
>>>>
>>>> Also, I fixed test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/sa/ClhsdbFlags.java 
>>>> metnioned by Igor, and removed null pointer check as Ioi suggested 
>>>> in startApp method.
>>>>
>>>> + public static void startApp(LingeredApp theApp, String... 
>>>> additionalJvmOpts) throws IOException {
>>>> + startAppExactJvmOpts(theApp, 
>>>> Utils.appendTestJavaOpts(additionalJvmOpts));
>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> Leonid
>>>>
>>>> On 3/25/20 10:14 AM, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
>>>>> On 2020-03-25 17:40, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Leonid,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have briefly looked at the patch, a few comments so far:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/sa/ClhsdbFlags.java:
>>>>>> � - at L#114, could you please call static method using class 
>>>>>> name (as the opposite of using instance)? or was it meant to be 
>>>>>> theApp.runAppVmOpts(vmArgs) ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> test/lib/jdk/test/lib/apps/LingeredApp.java:
>>>>>> - it seems that code indent of startApp(LingeredApp, String[]) 
>>>>>> isn't correct
>>>>>> - I don't like startAppVmOpts name, but unfortunately don't have 
>>>>>> a better suggestion (yet)
>>>>>
>>>>> I was going to say the same. Jtreg has the concept of "java 
>>>>> options" and "vm options". We have had a fair share of bugs and 
>>>>> wasted time when tests have been using the "vm options" part 
>>>>> (VM_OPTIONS, test.vm.options, etc), and we've been moving away 
>>>>> from using that way to pass options. I recently cleaned up some of 
>>>>> this with:
>>>>>
>>>>> 8237111: LingeredApp should be started with getTestJavaOpts
>>>>>
>>>>> Because of this, I would prefer if we used a name that doesn't 
>>>>> include "VmOpts", because it's too alike the other concept. Some 
>>>>> suggestions:
>>>>> �startAppJavaOptions
>>>>> �startAppUsingJavaOptions
>>>>> �startAppWithJavaOptions
>>>>> �startAppExactJavaOptions
>>>>> �startAppJvmOptions
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> StefanK
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> -- Igor
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 25, 2020, at 8:55 AM, Leonid Mesnik 
>>>>>>> <leonid.mesnik at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could you please review following fix which change LingeredApp 
>>>>>>> to prepend vm options to java/vm.test.opts when startApp is used 
>>>>>>> and provide startAppVmOpts to override options completely.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The intention is to avoid issue like in this bug where 
>>>>>>> test/jtreg options were ignored by tests. Also I fixed some 
>>>>>>> tests where intention was to append vm options rather than to 
>>>>>>> override them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lmesnik/8240698/webrev.00/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240698
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leonid
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list