RFR: 8241080: Consolidate signature parsing code in serviceability tools

Chris Plummer chris.plummer at oracle.com
Mon May 11 18:12:41 UTC 2020


Hi Daniil,

Overall looks good. Just one minor thing. In ClassTypeImpl.c and 
ObjectReferenceImpl.c I think the following would be more readable with 
an if/else:

   79         return JNI_FUNC_PTR(env,ExceptionOccurred)(env) ? 
AGENT_ERROR_JNI_EXCEPTION
   80             : JVMTI_ERROR_NONE;

Also, have you filed a CR for the JDWP spec issues related to missing 
type information in some of the protocol packet descriptions?

thanks,

Chris

On 5/9/20 9:29 AM, Daniil Titov wrote:
> Please review a change[1] that centralizes the signature processing in serviceability tools to make it capable of being easily extensible in the future.
>
> Testing: Mach5 tier1-tier3 tests successfully passed.
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dtitov/8241080/webrev.01
> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241080
>
> Thank you,
> Daniil
>
>




More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list