RFR: JDK-8247589: Implementation of Alpine Linux/x64 Port [v6]
Aleksei Voitylov
avoitylov at openjdk.java.net
Thu Oct 8 10:52:53 UTC 2020
> continuing the review thread from here https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-September/068546.html
>
>> The download side of using JNI in these tests is that it complicates the
>> setup a bit for those that run jtreg directly and/or just build the JDK
>> and not the test libraries. You could reduce this burden a bit by
>> limiting the load library/isMusl check to Linux only, meaning isMusl
>> would not be called on other platforms.
>>
>> The alternative you suggest above might indeed be better. I assume you
>> don't mean splitting the tests but rather just adding a second @test
>> description so that the vm.musl case runs the test with a system
>> property that allows the test know the expected load library path behavior.
>
> I have updated the PR to split the two tests in multiple @test s.
>
>> The updated comment in java_md.c in this looks good. A minor comment on
>> Platform.isBusybox is Files.isSymbolicLink returning true implies that
>> the link exists so no need to check for exists too. Also the
>> if-then-else style for the new class in ProcessBuilder/Basic.java is
>> inconsistent with the rest of the test so it stands out.
>
> Thank you, these changes are done in the updated PR.
>
>> Given the repo transition this weekend then I assume you'll create a PR
>> for the final review at least. Also I see JEP 386 hasn't been targeted
>> yet but I assume Boris, as owner, will propose-to-target and wait for it
>> to be targeted before it is integrated.
>
> Yes. How can this be best accomplished with the new git workflow?
> - we can continue the review process till the end and I will request the integration to happen only after the JEP is
> targeted. I guess this step is now done by typing "slash integrate" in a comment.
> - we can pause the review process now until the JEP is targeted.
>
> In the first case I'm kindly asking the Reviewers who already chimed in on that to re-confirm the review here.
Aleksei Voitylov has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now
contains three commits:
- Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8247589
- JDK-8247589: Implementation of Alpine Linux/x64 Port
- JDK-8247589: Implementation of Alpine Linux/x64 Port
-------------
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/49/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=49&range=05
Stats: 403 lines in 30 files changed: 348 ins; 17 del; 38 mod
Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/49.diff
Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/49/head:pull/49
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/49
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list