Integrated: 8254125: Assertion in cppVtables.cpp during builds on 32bit Windows
Ioi Lam
iklam at openjdk.java.net
Fri Oct 16 05:18:33 UTC 2020
On Sun, 11 Oct 2020 04:04:56 GMT, Ioi Lam <iklam at openjdk.org> wrote:
> **Problem:** when iterating over the cloned vtables, the original code assumes that they are laid out consecutively in
> memory. However, since [JDK-8224509](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224509), the memory allocated for each
> of the the cloned vtables is now 8-byte aligned. This introduces gaps between the cloned vtables, and causes the assert
> to fail.
>
> **Fix:** the fix is to no longer assume the consecutive memory layout. Instead, use the CppVtables::_index array to
> access each individual cloned vtable.
>
> **Note:** I also cleaned up the code significantly. I feel the original code is pretty hard to understand, so if I just
> do the bare minimum to fix the bug, it will be pretty hard to review.
>
> I would suggest that the reviewers look at just the new version of the code and see if it's working as described
> (instead of looking at the diff to understand what the bug was and how it has been fixed).
> This version still uses the x-macro CPP_VTABLE_TYPES_DO to enumerate over the classes whose vtables need to be cloned.
> I plan to change that into templates in a future RFE.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 5145bed0
Author: Ioi Lam <iklam at openjdk.org>
URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/5145bed0
Stats: 172 lines in 11 files changed: 33 ins; 63 del; 76 mod
8254125: Assertion in cppVtables.cpp during builds on 32bit Windows
Reviewed-by: shade, ccheung
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/591
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list