RFR: 8252593: [TESTBUG] serviceability/jvmti/GetLocalVariable/GetLocalWithoutSuspendTest.java failed with JVMTI_ERROR_INVALID_SLOT
    Richard Reingruber 
    rrich at openjdk.java.net
       
    Sat Sep 12 23:26:13 UTC 2020
    
    
  
Continuing review [1] after transition to Git/Github.
I still cannot reproduce the issue.
RFC on alternatives:
1. Integrate this change and ignore future JVMTI_ERROR_INVALID_SLOT
2. Don't ignore JVMTI_ERROR_INVALID_SLOT but integrate the rest of this patch. If the test still fails with
JVMTI_ERROR_INVALID_SLOT we will at least know the depth of the frame. 3. Add trace code to VM_GetOrSetLocal in
!PRODUCT or ASSERT configurations depending on an option or property.
Any other ideas?
I'm in favour of 1.
[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2020-September/032876.html
-------------
Commit messages:
 - 8252593: [TESTBUG] serviceability/jvmti/GetLocalVariable/GetLocalWithoutSuspendTest.java failed with JVMTI_ERROR_INVALID_SLOT
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/142/files
 Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=142&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252593
  Stats: 7 lines in 1 file changed: 4 ins; 0 del; 3 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/142.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/142/head:pull/142
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/142
    
    
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list