RFR: 8257831: Suspend with handshakes [v6]
Daniel D.Daugherty
dcubed at openjdk.java.net
Mon Apr 12 21:02:49 UTC 2021
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:53:46 GMT, Robbin Ehn <rehn at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> A suspend request is done by handshaking thread target thread(s). When executing the handshake operation we know the target mutator thread is in a dormant state (as in safepoint safe state). We have a guarantee that it will check it's poll before leaving the dormant state. To stop the thread from leaving the the dormant state we install a second asynchronous handshake to be executed by the targeted thread. The asynchronous handshake will wait on a monitor while the thread is suspended. The target thread cannot not leave the dormant state without a resume request.
>>
>> Per thread suspend requests are naturally serialized by the per thread HandshakeState lock (we can only execute one handshake at a time per thread).
>> Instead of having a separate lock we use this to our advantage and use HandshakeState lock for serializing access to the suspend flag and for wait/notify.
>>
>> Suspend:
>> Requesting thread -> synchronous handshake -> target thread
>> Inside synchronus handshake (HandshakeState lock is locked while
>> executing any handshake):
>> - Set suspended flag
>> - Install asynchronous handshake
>>
>> Target thread -> tries to leave dormant state -> Executes handshakes
>> Target only executes asynchronous handshake:
>> - While suspended
>> - Go to blocked
>> - Wait on HandshakeState lock
>>
>> Resume:
>> Resuming thread:
>> - Lock HandshakeState lock
>> - Clear suspended flag
>> - Notify HandshakeState lock
>> - Unlock HandshakeState lock
>>
>> The "suspend requested" flag is an optimization, without it a dormant thread could be suspended and resumed many times and each would add a new asynchronous handshake. Suspend requested flag means there is already an asynchronous suspend handshake in queue which can be re-used, only the suspend flag needs to be set.
>>
>> ----
>> Some code can be simplified or done in a smarter way but I refrained from doing such changes instead tried to keep existing code as is as far as possible. This concerns especially raw monitors.
>>
>> ----
>> Regarding the changed test, the documentation says:
>> "If the calling thread is specified in the request_list array, this function will not return until some other thread resumes it."
>>
>> But the code:
>> LOG("suspendTestedThreads: before JVMTI SuspendThreadList");
>> err = jvmti->SuspendThreadList(threads_count, threads, results);
>> ...
>> // Allow the Main thread to inspect the result of tested threads suspension
>> agent_unlock(jni);
>>
>> The thread will never return from SuspendThreadList until resumed, so it cannot unlock with agent_unlock().
>> Thus main thread is stuck forever on:
>> // Block until the suspender thread competes the tested threads suspension
>> agent_lock(jni);
>>
>> And never checks and resumes the threads. So I removed that lock instead just sleep and check until all thread have the expected suspended state.
>>
>> ----
>>
>> This version already contains updates after pre-review comments from @dcubed-ojdk, @pchilano, @coleenp.
>> (Pre-review comments here:
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/2625)
>>
>> ----
>> Testing t1-t8, nsk_jdi/nsk_jvmti/jdk_jdi/tck, KS24, RunThese and
>> combinations like running with -XX:ZCollectionInterval=0.01 -
>> XX:ZFragmentationLimit=0.
>> Running above some of above concurrently (load ~240), slow debug,
>> etc...
>
> Robbin Ehn has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains eight commits:
>
> - Merge branch 'master' into SuspendInHandshake
> - Review fixes 2
> - White space fixes
> - Merge branch 'master' into SuspendInHandshake
> - Review fixes
> - Merge branch 'master' into SuspendInHandshake
> - Merge branch 'master' into SuspendInHandshake
> - 8257831: Suspend with handshake (review baseline)
I only found nits so still looks good to me.
src/hotspot/share/runtime/handshake.cpp line 466:
> 464: // The exception to this rule is the asynchronous suspension handshake.
> 465: // It by-passes the NSV by manully doing the transition.
> 466: // Since we can have safepoints while suspeneded we need to release the tty locker if it is held.
nit typo: s/manully/manually/
nit typo: s/suspeneded/suspended/
src/hotspot/share/runtime/handshake.hpp line 133:
> 131: // check the _lock, if held go to slow path.
> 132: // Since the handshakee is unsafe if _lock gets lock after this check
> 133: // we know another threads cannot process any handshakes.
nit typo: s/_lock gets lock/_lock gets locked/
nit typo: s/threads/thread/
src/hotspot/share/runtime/thread.cpp line 1448:
> 1446: // The careful dance between thread suspension and exit is handled here.
> 1447: // Since we are in vm and suspension is done with handshakes,
> 1448: // we can just put in the exiting state and it will be corrcetly handled.
Perhaps: s/Since we are in vm and/Since we are in thread_in_vm state and/
nit typo: s/corrcetly/correctly/
-------------
Marked as reviewed by dcubed (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3191
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list