RFR: 8259799: vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/Breakpoint/breakpoint001 is incorrect
Igor Ignatyev
iignatyev at openjdk.java.net
Thu Jan 14 19:26:05 UTC 2021
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 19:09:59 GMT, Leonid Mesnik <lmesnik at openjdk.org> wrote:
> est vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/Breakpoint/breakpoint001 has incorrect check of strcmp results here:
>
> for (i=0; i<METH_NUM; i++)
> if (strcmp(methNam,METHODS[i][0]) &&
> strcmp(methSig,METHODS[i][1])) {
> printf("CHECK PASSED: method name: "%s"\tsignature: "%s" %d\n",
> methNam, methSig, i);
> if (checkStatus == PASSED)
> bpEvents[i]++;
> break;
> }
>
> So test passed when both strcmp (name,sig) are not zero.
>
> The test passes only because there are 2 methods that are checked and it increases counters for "incorrect" methods.
@lmesnik , looks good to me, besides a few nits.
test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/Breakpoint/breakpoint001/breakpoint001.cpp line 2:
> 1: /*
> 2: * Copyright (c) 2003, 2020, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
it's 2021
test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/Breakpoint/breakpoint001/breakpoint001.cpp line 173:
> 171:
> 172: for (i=0; i<METH_NUM; i++)
> 173: if (strcmp(methNam,METHODS[i][0]) == 0 &&
could you please add space before `,`?
-------------
Marked as reviewed by iignatyev (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2084
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list