RFR: 8264734: Some SA classes could use better hashCode() implementation

Mitsuru kariya github.com+2217224+kariya-mitsuru at openjdk.java.net
Mon May 10 06:27:12 UTC 2021


On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 04:41:20 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplummer at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The current `hashCode` implementation of SA's Address subclasses ignores the upper 32 bits of the long value.
>> This PR changes to use `Long.hashCode` instead.
>
> @kariya-mitsuru Please enable github actions on your jdk personal fork to enable the pre-submit testing. Start with the following link:
> 
> https://github.com/kariya-mitsuru/jdk/actions
> 
> Click on "Settings" tab and then click on "Actions" from the list of settings (not the "Actions" tab). Then enable "Allow all Actions".

@plummercj Would you please check the changes again?
Also, should I issue the /contributor command?

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3522


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list