RFR: 8264734: Some SA classes could use better hashCode() implementation [v4]
Mitsuru kariya
github.com+2217224+kariya-mitsuru at openjdk.java.net
Tue May 11 06:35:43 UTC 2021
> The current `hashCode` implementation of SA's Address subclasses ignores the upper 32 bits of the long value.
> This PR changes to use `Long.hashCode` instead.
Mitsuru kariya has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
Update copyright
-------------
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3522/files
- new: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3522/files/ac5c2660..71b663cd
Webrevs:
- full: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=3522&range=03
- incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=3522&range=02-03
Stats: 3 lines in 3 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 3 mod
Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3522.diff
Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3522/head:pull/3522
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3522
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list