[jdk19] RFR: 8287847: Fatal Error when suspending virtual thread after it has terminated [v7]

Serguei Spitsyn sspitsyn at openjdk.org
Sat Jul 2 02:41:40 UTC 2022


On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 18:17:35 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplummer at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This fixes a bug in the debug agent when there is a request to suspend a virtual thread that has already terminated. The issue was that unless the debug agent was currently under a "suspend all", it would not properly put the virtual thread on the `otherThreads` list, and instead added it to `runningVThreads`. This meant at the end of `insertThread()` the following code tried to do a JVMTI `SetThreadLocalStorage`, which can't be done on a terminated thread.
>> 
>> 
>>         if (list != &otherThreads) {
>>             setThreadLocalStorage(node->thread, (void*)node);
>>         }
>
> Chris Plummer has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   provide a slightly more descriptive @summary

test/jdk/com/sun/jdi/TestScaffold.java line 976:

> 974:                 }
> 975:             });
> 976:             Thread.currentThread().setName(OLD_MAIN_THREAD_NAME);

Just want to understand what is this thread naming is about.
Is it just to properly name the threads, or there is some other reason for this?
Also, why OLD_MAIN_THREAD_NAME is a little bit strange and why old?

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk19/pull/88


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list