RFR: 8288387: GetLocalXXX/SetLocalXXX spec should require suspending target thread [v2]
Serguei Spitsyn
sspitsyn at openjdk.org
Fri Oct 7 09:23:20 UTC 2022
On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 17:31:00 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn <sspitsyn at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The spec of JVM TI GetLocalXXX/SetLocalXXX functions is updated to require the target thread to be suspended. If not suspended then the JVMTI_ERROR_THREAD_NOT_SUSPENDED error code is returned by the implementation.
>>
>> The CSR is: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8294690
>>
>> A few tests are impacted by this fix:
>>
>> test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/vthread/GetSetLocalTest
>> test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/vthread/VThreadTest
>> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/capability/CM01/cm01t011
>>
>>
>> The following test has been removed as non-relevant any more:
>> ` test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/GetLocalVariable/GetLocalWithoutSuspendTest.java`
>>
>> New negative test has been added instead:
>> ` test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/GetLocalVariable/GetSetLocalUnsuspended.java`
>>
>> All JVM TI and JPDA tests were used locally for verification.
>> They were also run in Loom repository with `JTREG_MAIN_WRAPPER=Virtual`.
>>
>> Mach5 test runs on all platforms are TBD.
>
> Serguei Spitsyn has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> addressed review comments about is_JavaThread_current and @enablePreview tag
Thank you, Alan!
I did not refresh my browser, an so, did not see your review.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10586
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list